When is the deadline for appoint the presiding arbitrator?

CIETAC Arbitration Rules 27(2)–(3) provides ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt. Parties jointly nominating the presiding arbitrator must establish respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration when considering this step. The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch.

Responsible actor. Parties jointly nominating the presiding arbitrator.

Respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration.

CIETAC Arbitration Rules effective January 1, 2024. Establish the applicable edition and foreign-related ordinary procedure. The retained 2015 catalog labels are historical, not automatic current-edition equivalents.

Source guide. CIETAC Arbitration Rules 27(2)–(3) provides ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt. Establish respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.

1. Jointly nominate or entrust appointment of the presiding arbitrator.
2. Ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt.
3. The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch.
4. Article 6 governs service and period calculation. Identify the actual Notice of Arbitration or Notice of Acceptance of Counterclaim, the specified recipient and any approved extension.

Article 6 governs service and period calculation. Identify the actual Notice of Arbitration or Notice of Acceptance of Counterclaim, the specified recipient and any approved extension.

The applicable recipient or institutional calendar and any valid direction must be established. This source guide does not apply a generic seat-calendar rollover.

Source guide. CIETAC Arbitration Rules 27(2)–(3) provides ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt. Establish respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.

The file identifies respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, but only the catalog period is supplied. CIETAC Arbitration Rules 27(2)–(3) states ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt. The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch. Check the actual source conditions before deriving an endpoint. No computed date. Establish the operative source facts and applicable edition.

A party supplies a seat calendar for cIETAC presiding arbitrator joint nomination, without proving the source recipient or completion route. Article 6 governs service and period calculation. Identify the actual Notice of Arbitration or Notice of Acceptance of Counterclaim, the specified recipient and any approved extension. A generic seat calendar cannot prove every recipient, institutional decision and valid procedural variation. No computed date. Establish the relevant calendar and actual procedural decisions.

The file concerns jointly nominate or entrust appointment of the presiding arbitrator, but the governing edition or procedural branch remains unconfirmed. CIETAC Arbitration Rules effective January 1, 2024. Establish the applicable edition and foreign-related ordinary procedure. The retained 2015 catalog labels are historical, not automatic current-edition equivalents. The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch. The existing page also retains CIETAC Rules 2015 Article 27(2)–(4). Each edition needs its own applicability finding. Matching numbers do not establish interchangeable procedures. The 2015 candidate-list route differs from the current agreed co-arbitrator route. Failure permits appointment by the Chairman. Article 31 addresses disclosure, not this nomination clock. No computed date or purchase. Review the actual edition and branch separately.

Actual source event

Respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration

Applicable procedural branch

The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch.

Applicable edition and counting

CIETAC Arbitration Rules effective January 1, 2024. Establish the applicable edition and foreign-related ordinary procedure. The retained 2015 catalog labels are historical, not automatic current-edition equivalents. Article 6 governs service and period calculation. Identify the actual Notice of Arbitration or Notice of Acceptance of Counterclaim, the specified recipient and any approved extension.

• Source guide. CIETAC Arbitration Rules 27(2)–(3) provides ordinarily 15 days after respondent receipt. Establish respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.
• The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch. The existing page also retains CIETAC Rules 2015 Article 27(2)–(4). Each edition needs its own applicability finding. Matching numbers do not establish interchangeable procedures. The 2015 candidate-list route differs from the current agreed co-arbitrator route. Failure permits appointment by the Chairman. Article 31 addresses disclosure, not this nomination clock.

• CIETAC Arbitration Rules effective January 1, 2024. Establish the applicable edition and foreign-related ordinary procedure. The retained 2015 catalog labels are historical, not automatic current-edition equivalents.
• Establish respondent's receipt of the Notice of Arbitration.
• The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch.
• Retain the applicable source notice, procedural order and completion evidence.
• The source-defined act is jointly nominate or entrust appointment of the presiding arbitrator. The controlling current provision is Article 27, not Article 31. An agreed co-arbitrator nomination route has a separate seven-day acceptance-based branch. No unadjusted arithmetic endpoint is represented as a final date.