Skip to main content

Institutional arbitration procedure guides

When is the deadline for proposal to disqualify an arbitrator?

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Party challenging an arbitrator must establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts when considering this step. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
21 days after the later event
Trigger
Later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts
Rule
ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)
ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

ICSID Arbitration Rules effective July 1, 2022. Establish the applicable consent and proceeding edition. Convention applications retain their separate statutory requirements.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

Source guide. ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

When is the deadline for proposal to disqualify an arbitrator?

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Party challenging an arbitrator must establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts when considering this step. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

Responsible actor. Party challenging an arbitrator.

Later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts.

ICSID Arbitration Rules effective July 1, 2022. Establish the applicable consent and proceeding edition. Convention applications retain their separate statutory requirements.

Source guide. ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

How does this provision count time?

  1. File the proposal for disqualification.
  2. 21 days after the later event.
  3. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.
  4. Rule 9 governs time calculation. Rule 11 forbids extending the Convention Articles 49, 51 and 52 limits. Establish the actual notification, dispatch or other specified event before counting. Tribunal decision targets and party application rights have different legal effects.

Rule 9 governs time calculation. Rule 11 forbids extending the Convention Articles 49, 51 and 52 limits. Establish the actual notification, dispatch or other specified event before counting. Tribunal decision targets and party application rights have different legal effects.

The applicable recipient or institutional calendar and any valid direction must be established. This source guide does not apply a generic seat-calendar rollover.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

Source guide. ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

The file identifies later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts, but only the catalog period is supplied. ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) states 21 days after the later event. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test. Check the actual source conditions before deriving an endpoint. No computed date. Establish the operative source facts and applicable edition.

A party supplies a seat calendar for iCSID arbitrator disqualification proposal, without proving the source recipient or completion route. Rule 9 governs time calculation. Rule 11 forbids extending the Convention Articles 49, 51 and 52 limits. Establish the actual notification, dispatch or other specified event before counting. Tribunal decision targets and party application rights have different legal effects. A generic seat calendar cannot prove every recipient, institutional decision and valid procedural variation. No computed date. Establish the relevant calendar and actual procedural decisions.

The file concerns file the proposal for disqualification, but the governing edition or procedural branch remains unconfirmed. ICSID Arbitration Rules effective July 1, 2022. Establish the applicable consent and proceeding edition. Convention applications retain their separate statutory requirements. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test. No computed date or purchase. Review the actual edition and branch separately.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Actual source event
Later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts
Applicable procedural branch
The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.
Applicable edition and counting
ICSID Arbitration Rules effective July 1, 2022. Establish the applicable consent and proceeding edition. Convention applications retain their separate statutory requirements. Rule 9 governs time calculation. Rule 11 forbids extending the Convention Articles 49, 51 and 52 limits. Establish the actual notification, dispatch or other specified event before counting. Tribunal decision targets and party application rights have different legal effects.
ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)
  • Source guide. ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) provides 21 days after the later event. Establish later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts, the applicable edition, recipient calendar and actual procedural decisions before using a final date. This page supplies no computed date or purchase.
  • The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

When is the deadline for proposal to disqualify an arbitrator?

Who handles iCSID arbitrator disqualification proposal?

Party challenging an arbitrator. The source identifies this actor for the following act. File the proposal for disqualification. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

What event starts this ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) procedure?

Later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts. Retain the actual communication, appointment, submission or decision identified by this provision. An estimate or another procedural event does not establish this anchor.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

What period does ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) state?

21 days after the later event. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test. The source period remains visible even though this page withholds a final computed date.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

Which edition applies to iCSID arbitrator disqualification proposal?

ICSID Arbitration Rules effective July 1, 2022. Establish the applicable consent and proceeding edition. Convention applications retain their separate statutory requirements. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

How do calendar and procedural variations affect iCSID arbitrator disqualification proposal?

Rule 9 governs time calculation. Rule 11 forbids extending the Convention Articles 49, 51 and 52 limits. Establish the actual notification, dispatch or other specified event before counting. Tribunal decision targets and party application rights have different legal effects. The proposal must state its grounds and be filed after constitution. Awareness alone does not replace the later-of test.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

Why does this ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a) guide withhold a purchase date?

The source identifies file the proposal for disqualification, from later of Tribunal constitution and the party first knowing or being required to know the relevant facts. The necessary applicable edition, actual events, decisions and completion calendar have not been qualified as one supported calculation. This does not erase the source period or turn a procedural right or institutional target into a party filing duty.

ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)

Official sources and review

Provisions used (1)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
ICSID Arbitration Rules 22(1)(a)Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.