Australia · Northern Territory limitations
Which of the two limitation periods controls a Northern Territory contribution action?
The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
- Period
- The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period
- Trigger
- Both contribution accrual under section 24(2) and expiry of the principal-action limitation period under section 24(3)
- Rule
- Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24 supplies this review’s identified branch. The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. Both contribution accrual under section 24(2) and expiry of the principal-action limitation period under section 24(3). The official current linked Limitation Act reprint REPL026 is in force August 11, 2025. The retained Interpretation Act is in force April 21, 2023. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24. The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first. The actual claim classification, source anchors and completion facts require review. This interim source guide provides no unqualified computed or paid date.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which of the two limitation periods controls a Northern Territory contribution action?
The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Responsible actor. Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors.
Both contribution accrual under section 24(2) and expiry of the principal-action limitation period under section 24(3)
Use the judgment or arbitral-award date, or the agreement fixing liability where neither exists. A later variation of quantum does not reset the judgment anchor.
Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24How does this provision count time?
- The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period
- Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors.
- A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. The source requires the stated comparison or running history. A single selected date cannot establish the omitted anchor, other applicable period or suspension history. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
For contribution limitation two-year limb, Interpretation Act section 28(2) addresses a last day for doing a thing that falls on Saturday, Sunday or a full-day public holiday where the thing may be done. Establish the actual completion place and the applicable source branch. It does not prove accrual, permission, eligibility or that a proposed court extension was granted. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Which facts prevent one automatic date?
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24. The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first. The actual claim classification, source anchors and completion facts require review. This interim source guide provides no unqualified computed or paid date.
Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors identifies judgment, arbitral award or qualifying liability-fixing agreement under section 24(2). The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
A weekend or full-day public holiday falls at the proposed endpoint while considering contribution limitation two-year limb. For contribution limitation two-year limb, Interpretation Act section 28(2) addresses a last day for doing a thing that falls on Saturday, Sunday or a full-day public holiday where the thing may be done. Establish the actual completion place and the applicable source branch. It does not prove accrual, permission, eligibility or that a proposed court extension was granted. Retain the actual completion place and source branch for contribution limitation two-year limb. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first. The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. The missing or different source facts prevent treating a single generic date as the applicable limit. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual claimant, remedy and source event
- Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors. Judgment, arbitral award or qualifying liability-fixing agreement under section 24(2).
- Applicable limitation branch and material facts
- A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
- Statutory reckoning and actual completion place
- For contribution limitation two-year limb, Interpretation Act section 28(2) addresses a last day for doing a thing that falls on Saturday, Sunday or a full-day public holiday where the thing may be done. Establish the actual completion place and the applicable source branch. It does not prove accrual, permission, eligibility or that a proposed court extension was granted. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
- Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors. Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
- Section 24 governs one contribution action. Paragraphs (1)(a) and (1)(b) supply mandatory competing limits, rather than separate remedies. The original two-year and four-year catalog records remain distinct evidence. The four-year route redirects here because both anchors must be assessed together.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
Which of the two limitation periods controls a Northern Territory contribution action?
What source period applies to contribution limitation two-year limb?
The earlier of two years from contribution accrual and four years from expiry of the principal-action period. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Which actual event controls contribution limitation two-year limb?
Judgment, arbitral award or qualifying liability-fixing agreement under section 24(2). Person bringing a qualifying contribution action between tortfeasors must establish that event from the claim and source records before selecting a filing date.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24What must the responsible actor complete for contribution limitation two-year limb?
Commence the contribution action after retaining both statutory anchors. A later variation in damages does not replace the identified judgment date. The two-year limb cannot stand alone if the principal-action limb expires first.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Does payment always start contribution accrual?
Section 24(2) chooses judgment or award in its first branch. Where that branch does not apply, it chooses an agreement fixing the claimant’s liability amount. It does not universally select actual payment.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Does a later damages variation restart two years?
Section 24(2)(a) expressly applies whether or not the judgment is later varied as to quantum or damages. Retain the original operative judgment date.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Why is the principal-action expiry also necessary?
Section 24(1) bars the action on the first of its two periods to expire. The four-year limb runs from expiry of the period for the principal action.
Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24Official sources and review
Provisions used (5)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 24 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 12 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Limitation Act 1981 (NT) section 44 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Interpretation Act 1978 (NT) section 28 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Interpretation Act 1978 (NT) section 17 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |