Skip to main content

Alberta civil procedure

What is Alberta’s limitation for a claim based on a money judgment?

10 years after that claim arose. Seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
10 years after that claim arose
Trigger
The date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose
Rule
Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11
Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Official Limitations Act current December 15, 2022, acquired from Alberta King’s Printer October 9, 2026.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date. The unresolved completion facts are the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose and the source-qualified route to seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

What is Alberta’s limitation for a claim based on a money judgment?

10 years after that claim arose. Seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.

Responsible actor. The claimant seeking a remedial order based on a money judgment.

The date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose.

Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.

Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

How does this provision count time?

  1. Identify the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose.
  2. Seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies.
  3. For seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies, establish the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose under Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11. The source states 10 years after that claim arose. Interpretation Act section 22 addresses time reckoning. Rules of Court day counting cannot be imported merely because the dispute concerns a court.
  4. The judgment based limitation immunity concerns seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. A registry being closed does not itself prove that availability, a ceiling, immunity or a service fact moves forward. Establish the precise statutory act and any applicable Interpretation Act section 22 holiday or office rule.

For seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies, establish the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose under Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11. The source states 10 years after that claim arose. Interpretation Act section 22 addresses time reckoning. Rules of Court day counting cannot be imported merely because the dispute concerns a court.

The judgment based limitation immunity concerns seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. A registry being closed does not itself prove that availability, a ceiling, immunity or a service fact moves forward. Establish the precise statutory act and any applicable Interpretation Act section 22 holiday or office rule.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date. The unresolved completion facts are the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose and the source-qualified route to seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

The claimant seeking a remedial order based on a money judgment establishes the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose. Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date. 10 years after that claim arose. Seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. This source scenario does not calculate a final date.

The proposed boundary for seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies meets a holiday or closed office. The judgment based limitation immunity concerns seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies. A registry being closed does not itself prove that availability, a ceiling, immunity or a service fact moves forward. Establish the precise statutory act and any applicable Interpretation Act section 22 holiday or office rule. Establish the precise judgment based limitation immunity and applicable closure facts. No moved final date is supplied.

The order provides non-monetary relief rather than payment of money. Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date. Review Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11 with the changed facts. 10 years after that claim arose cannot resolve this branch by itself.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Actual source branch
Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.
Source interval and calendar
For seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies, establish the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose under Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11. The source states 10 years after that claim arose. Interpretation Act section 22 addresses time reckoning. Rules of Court day counting cannot be imported merely because the dispute concerns a court.
Actor and completion
The claimant seeking a remedial order based on a money judgment. Seek the qualifying remedial order before pleaded limitation immunity applies.
Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11
  • Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.
  • The actor is the claimant seeking a remedial order based on a money judgment. The event is the date the qualifying judgment-based claim arose. The boundary is judgment based limitation immunity. Section 11 addresses a claim based on a judgment or order for payment of money. It does not make every enforcement act interchangeable or prove accrual solely from a judgment-entry date.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

What is Alberta’s limitation for a claim based on a money judgment?

Does section 11 cover every kind of order?

Its wording is confined to a judgment or order for payment of money.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

What event starts the ten years?

The date the claim arose, which must be established for the actual judgment-based claim.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Does the source require a remedial order?

It addresses the claimant seeking a remedial order in respect of the qualifying claim.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Is immunity automatic without pleading?

Section 11 gives immunity to the defendant on pleading the Act as a defence.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Can a generic execution-permission date be substituted?

No. The section 11 claim and any procedural execution or renewal route must be distinguished.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Does the date of an enforcement reminder establish accrual?

No. Retain the actual judgment, obligation and facts establishing when this claim arose.

Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11

Official sources and review

Provisions used (2)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12, s 11Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Alberta Interpretation Act, section 22Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.