Alberta civil procedure
When must Alberta judicial review supporting evidence be filed and served?
1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus. File supporting evidence and serve it on every other party. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
- Period
- 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus
- Trigger
- The actual judicial review hearing date
- Rule
- Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)
Official Rules of Court volume current June 2026, including AR 79/2026. The official 2026 regulation index was checked for subsequent amendments.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate. The unresolved completion facts are the actual judicial review hearing date and the source-qualified route to file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must Alberta judicial review supporting evidence be filed and served?
1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus. File supporting evidence and serve it on every other party. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
Responsible actor. The applicant relying on judicial review supporting evidence.
The actual judicial review hearing date.
Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)How does this provision count time?
- Identify the actual judicial review hearing date.
- File supporting evidence and serve it on every other party.
- The 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual judicial review hearing date. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
- The required spacing for file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party runs before the actual judicial review hearing date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later.
The 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual judicial review hearing date. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
The required spacing for file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party runs before the actual judicial review hearing date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Which facts prevent one automatic date?
Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate. The unresolved completion facts are the actual judicial review hearing date and the source-qualified route to file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party.
The applicant relying on judicial review supporting evidence establishes the actual judicial review hearing date. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate. 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus. File supporting evidence and serve it on every other party. This source scenario does not calculate a final date.
The proposed boundary for file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party meets a holiday or closed office. The required spacing for file supporting evidence and serve it on every other party runs before the actual judicial review hearing date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later. Establish the precise minimum evidence filing and service spacing and applicable closure facts. No moved final date is supplied.
The proceeding is habeas corpus. The one-month supporting-evidence branch does not apply. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate. Review Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5) with the changed facts. 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus cannot resolve this branch by itself.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual source branch
- Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
- Source interval and calendar
- The 1 calendar month or more before hearing, excluding habeas corpus interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual judicial review hearing date. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
- Actor and completion
- The applicant relying on judicial review supporting evidence. File supporting evidence and serve it on every other party.
- Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
- The actor is the applicant relying on judicial review supporting evidence. The event is the actual judicial review hearing date. The boundary is minimum evidence filing and service spacing. Rule 3.15(5) concerns supporting evidence rather than the originating application itself. Habeas corpus is expressly excluded and has a separate rule 3.16 route. The initiating six-month filing and service boundary remains separate.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must Alberta judicial review supporting evidence be filed and served?
Does this interval govern the application itself?
Paragraph(5) expressly concerns evidence in support of the originating application.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Must evidence be filed as well as served?
Yes. It requires filing and service on every other party.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Does habeas corpus use this month?
No. Paragraph(5) expressly excludes it.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Does the hearing interval extend the initial review limit?
No. Rule 3.15(2) separately addresses initiating filing and service.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Can ten-day originating-application timing be applied to this evidence?
Rule 3.9 expressly reserves rule 3.15(5) for judicial review supporting evidence.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)What event is required before counting backward?
The actual hearing date and any governing order, not an anticipated hearing estimate.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5)Official sources and review
Provisions used (3)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 3.15(5) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Alberta Rules of Court, rules 13.2 to 13.5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Alberta Interpretation Act, section 22 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |