Alberta civil procedure
When must an Alberta streamlined trial conference be scheduled?
No later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial. Schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
- Period
- No later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial
- Trigger
- The actual streamlined trial date
- Rule
- Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)
Official Rules of Court volume current June 2026, including AR 79/2026. The official 2026 regulation index was checked for subsequent amendments.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues. The unresolved completion facts are the actual streamlined trial date and the source-qualified route to schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must an Alberta streamlined trial conference be scheduled?
No later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial. Schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
Responsible actor. The parties to the streamlined trial.
The actual streamlined trial date.
Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)How does this provision count time?
- Identify the actual streamlined trial date.
- Schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference.
- The no later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual streamlined trial date. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
- The required spacing for schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference runs before the actual streamlined trial date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later.
The no later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual streamlined trial date. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
The required spacing for schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference runs before the actual streamlined trial date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Which facts prevent one automatic date?
Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues. The unresolved completion facts are the actual streamlined trial date and the source-qualified route to schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference.
The parties to the streamlined trial establishes the actual streamlined trial date. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues. No later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial. Schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference. This source scenario does not calculate a final date.
The proposed boundary for schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference meets a holiday or closed office. The required spacing for schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference runs before the actual streamlined trial date. A forward move to an open day may reduce that spacing. Establish the actual completion method, applicable holiday rule and any direction instead of treating a closed endpoint as permission to act later. Establish the precise conference scheduling boundary and applicable closure facts. No moved final date is supplied.
A party treats the scheduling boundary as the conference’s mandatory actual hearing date. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues. Review Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4) with the changed facts. No later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial cannot resolve this branch by itself.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual source branch
- Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
- Source interval and calendar
- The no later than 3 calendar months before the streamlined trial interval uses rule 13.4 calendar-month or year reckoning. It preserves corresponding dates and the source’s absent-date rule. The actual anchor is the actual streamlined trial date. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
- Actor and completion
- The parties to the streamlined trial. Schedule a pretrial conference or a rule 4.10 conference.
- Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
- The actor is the parties to the streamlined trial. The event is the actual streamlined trial date. The boundary is conference scheduling boundary. Rule 8.29(4) requires scheduling the conference by the boundary. It does not say the conference itself must be held by that date. The conference confirms readiness, required trial time and case-management issues.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must an Alberta streamlined trial conference be scheduled?
Does the conference have to be held three months before trial?
The operative act in rule 8.29(4) is to schedule the conference. Preserve that distinction from holding it.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Which conference may be scheduled?
A pretrial conference or a conference under rule 4.10 for assistance by the Court.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)What must the conference address?
Trial readiness, the required trial time and other issues relating to streamlined trial management.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Does this replace trial-date confirmation?
No. Paragraph(5) separately applies rule 8.7 confirmation to the streamlined trial.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Can preparation time be ignored in the trial estimate?
Paragraph(3) requires sufficient time for the trial judge to review the streamlined trial record.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Do all streamlined trials require an alternative dispute process?
Paragraph(2) makes that duty depend on the streamlined trial order, procedural order or practice note.
Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4)Official sources and review
Provisions used (3)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010, r 8.29(4) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Alberta Rules of Court, rules 13.2 to 13.5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Alberta Interpretation Act, section 22 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |