DIFC and ADGM procedure guides
When is the deadline for minimum notice of an immediate judgment hearing?
Applicant or Court responsible for hearing notice must check Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6. At least fourteen days of notice. The identified act is to give notice of the hearing date and proposed issues. A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval. This guide preserves the source boundary without a calculated final date or paid calculation.
- Period
- At least fourteen days of notice
- Trigger
- Actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing
- Rule
- Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6
Use the maintained DIFC rule collection and actual orders. This review selects Amended Appeals for Part 44 and keeps Former Appeals separately as historical text. It does not assume every older matter uses the current route.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
Source guide. At least fourteen days of notice. Establish actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing and the applicable branch. No computed date or paid calculation is available because actual-event and completion qualifications remain unverified.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When is the deadline for minimum notice of an immediate judgment hearing?
Applicant or Court responsible for hearing notice must check Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6. At least fourteen days of notice. The identified act is to give notice of the hearing date and proposed issues. A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval. This guide preserves the source boundary without a calculated final date or paid calculation.
Responsible actor. Applicant or Court responsible for hearing notice.
Actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing
A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval.
Source guide. At least fourteen days of notice. Establish actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing and the applicable branch. No computed date or paid calculation is available because actual-event and completion qualifications remain unverified.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6How does this provision count time?
- At least fourteen days of notice
- RDC 2.12 counts days as clear days. The start day is excluded, and an event-defined end day is excluded too. RDC 2.13 excludes nonbusiness days for periods of five days or less; RDC 2.14 counts them for longer periods. RDC 2.19 uses calendar months.
- RDC 2.15 protects an act at the Registry when its prescribed period ends on a closed Registry day. It does not automatically extend every payment, service, minimum interval or conditional stay. RDC 2.17 ordinarily requires a stated-date act by 4 p.m., subject to the actual rule and order.
RDC 2.12 counts days as clear days. The start day is excluded, and an event-defined end day is excluded too. RDC 2.13 excludes nonbusiness days for periods of five days or less; RDC 2.14 counts them for longer periods. RDC 2.19 uses calendar months.
RDC 2.15 protects an act at the Registry when its prescribed period ends on a closed Registry day. It does not automatically extend every payment, service, minimum interval or conditional stay. RDC 2.17 ordinarily requires a stated-date act by 4 p.m., subject to the actual rule and order.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Which facts prevent one automatic date?
Source guide. At least fourteen days of notice. Establish actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing and the applicable branch. No computed date or paid calculation is available because actual-event and completion qualifications remain unverified.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Applicable statutory or procedural branch
- A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval.
- Applicable edition and transition
- Use the maintained DIFC rule collection and actual orders. This review selects Amended Appeals for Part 44 and keeps Former Appeals separately as historical text. It does not assume every older matter uses the current route.
- Source guide. At least fourteen days of notice. Establish actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing and the applicable branch. No computed date or paid calculation is available because actual-event and completion qualifications remain unverified.
- DIFC evidence answering a heavy application concerns file and serve evidence in answer from actual filing and service of the application and its supporting evidence, with within twenty-eight days thereafter. DIFC evidence for a Court-initiated immediate judgment concerns file the evidence and ordinarily serve each other party from actual court-initiated immediate-judgment hearing, with at least seven days before the hearing. DIFC evidence answering an ordinary application concerns file and serve evidence in answer from actual filing and service of the application and its supporting evidence, with within fourteen days thereafter. Those events do not replace actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing for this step.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When is the deadline for minimum notice of an immediate judgment hearing?
What period governs DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice?
At least fourteen days of notice. Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6 supplies this period. It does not by itself establish the actual event or a final completion date.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Which event controls DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice?
Establish actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing. A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval. The catalog date label does not prove this event.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Who completes the step for DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice?
Applicant or Court responsible for hearing notice. The source identifies the act as give notice of the hearing date and proposed issues. Filing, service, payment, a minimum notice and a stay status must remain distinct.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Which conditions change DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice?
A Court-initiated hearing requires notice to the parties, while an application requires notice to its respondent. This is a minimum notice interval. Use the maintained DIFC rule collection and actual orders. This review selects Amended Appeals for Part 44 and keeps Former Appeals separately as historical text. It does not assume every older matter uses the current route.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6How are time and closure treated for DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice?
RDC 2.12 counts days as clear days. The start day is excluded, and an event-defined end day is excluded too. RDC 2.13 excludes nonbusiness days for periods of five days or less; RDC 2.14 counts them for longer periods. RDC 2.19 uses calendar months. RDC 2.15 protects an act at the Registry when its prescribed period ends on a closed Registry day. It does not automatically extend every payment, service, minimum interval or conditional stay. RDC 2.17 ordinarily requires a stated-date act by 4 p.m., subject to the actual rule and order.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Why does DIFC minimum immediate judgment hearing notice show no final date?
The source period is retained, but the actual actual proposed immediate-judgment hearing and applicable completion route need checking against your case. Check the actual documents and orders. No paid calculation is available.
Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6Official sources and review
Provisions used (2)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 2014), Part 24, rule 24.6 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RDC 2.11-2.20, time and variations | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |