Skip to main content

England and Wales · Court of Appeal and Supreme Court

When is a separate Supreme Court cross-appeal notice needed?

Rule 23(5)(a) allows the cross-permission application to stand as the cross-appeal notice, or requires the appropriate notice filed and served within 42 days of the applicable permission or appeal-notice event. Establish which procedural branch applies.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
42 calendar days after the established operative event
Trigger
The permission or appeal-notice event applicable to the established rule 23(5)(a) cross-appeal branch
Rule
Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)
Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5) and its official supporting provisions were retained on October 8, 2026. This review concerns when is a separate supreme court cross-appeal notice needed, not an earlier rule edition or a different appeal route.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

Where the Court grants cross-permission, PD 4.37 makes the application stand as the notice and requires an intention-to-proceed notice under rule 19. Where cross-permission is unnecessary, PD 4.38 describes the separate 42-day notice. Establish this route before selecting the event. Identify whether the application already stands as the notice. If a separate notice is required, file and serve the proper form and follow the modified appeal requirements.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

When is a separate Supreme Court cross-appeal notice needed?

Rule 23(5)(a) allows the cross-permission application to stand as the cross-appeal notice, or requires the appropriate notice filed and served within 42 days of the applicable permission or appeal-notice event. Establish which procedural branch applies.

Responsible actor. The cross-appellant using the established notice branch.

Applying for cross-permission and giving a separate cross-appeal notice are different steps. Do not add a second notice when the application already stands as one.

No. Rule 23(5)(a) permits the permission application to stand as that notice.

Where the Court grants cross-permission, PD 4.37 makes the application stand as the notice and requires an intention-to-proceed notice under rule 19. Where cross-permission is unnecessary, PD 4.38 describes the separate 42-day notice. Establish this route before selecting the event.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

How does this provision count time?

  1. Rule 23(5)(a) allows the cross-permission application to stand as the cross-appeal notice, or requires the appropriate notice filed and served within 42 days of the applicable permission or appeal-notice event. Establish which procedural branch applies.
  2. The provision states 42 days from the applicable grant of permission or filing of the appeal notice.
  3. Identify whether the application already stands as the notice. If a separate notice is required, file and serve the proper form and follow the modified appeal requirements.

The event specified by Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5) controls this period. Establish that event before applying its fixed-after calendar count. The Court of Appeal clear-days model is not a substitute for the Supreme Court provision.

For Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5), rule 6(4)(a) extends Registry acts to the next Registry-open day. PD 2.3 includes weekends, England/Wales bank holidays and the Christmas vacation. A separate service act requires method-specific treatment; verify exceptional directions and portal downtime.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

Where the Court grants cross-permission, PD 4.37 makes the application stand as the notice and requires an intention-to-proceed notice under rule 19. Where cross-permission is unnecessary, PD 4.38 describes the separate 42-day notice. Establish this route before selecting the event. Identify whether the application already stands as the notice. If a separate notice is required, file and serve the proper form and follow the modified appeal requirements.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

Cross-permission is unnecessary and the original appeal notice is filed on October 8,2026. The respondent must establish the separate notice branch under PD 4.38. Rule 23(5)(a) allows the cross-permission application to stand as the cross-appeal notice, or requires the appropriate notice filed and served within 42 days of the applicable permission or appeal-notice event. Establish which procedural branch applies. Identify whether the application already stands as the notice. If a separate notice is required, file and serve the proper form and follow the modified appeal requirements.

The ordinary 42-day endpoint associated with Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5) falls during a weekend or the Registry Christmas closure, and no contrary direction is yet established. For Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5), rule 6(4)(a) extends Registry acts to the next Registry-open day. PD 2.3 includes weekends, England/Wales bank holidays and the Christmas vacation. A separate service act requires method-specific treatment; verify exceptional directions and portal downtime. Establish the actual filing and service branch before relying on one deadline for this procedure.

The permission application already stands as the cross-appeal notice, but the respondent assumes a second notice is always required. No. Rule 23(5)(a) permits the permission application to stand as that notice. Applying for cross-permission and giving a separate cross-appeal notice are different steps. Do not add a second notice when the application already stands as one.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Established procedural branch
Where the Court grants cross-permission, PD 4.37 makes the application stand as the notice and requires an intention-to-proceed notice under rule 19. Where cross-permission is unnecessary, PD 4.38 describes the separate 42-day notice. Establish this route before selecting the event.
Required completion
Identify whether the application already stands as the notice. If a separate notice is required, file and serve the proper form and follow the modified appeal requirements.
Related procedure distinction
Applying for cross-permission and giving a separate cross-appeal notice are different steps. Do not add a second notice when the application already stands as one.
Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)
  • Where the Court grants cross-permission, PD 4.37 makes the application stand as the notice and requires an intention-to-proceed notice under rule 19. Where cross-permission is unnecessary, PD 4.38 describes the separate 42-day notice. Establish this route before selecting the event.
  • Applying for cross-permission and giving a separate cross-appeal notice are different steps. Do not add a second notice when the application already stands as one.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

When is a separate Supreme Court cross-appeal notice needed?

Does every cross-appellant file a new cross-appeal notice?

No. Rule 23(5)(a) permits the permission application to stand as that notice.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

What period applies where a separate notice is required?

The provision states 42 days from the applicable grant of permission or filing of the appeal notice.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Is filing alone enough for the separate notice?

Rule 23(5)(a) requires filing and service.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Can one date input choose which cross-appeal branch applies?

No. PD 4.37 uses the Court-granted-permission continuation route; PD 4.38 addresses the separate notice where cross-permission is unnecessary.

UKSC PD 4.37–4.38

Do the ordinary appeal rules disappear for cross-appeals?

Rule 23 applies Part 4 with appropriate modifications.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Can a closed Registry date automatically extend all cross-notice service?

No. The filing extension and service completion require separate examination.

Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)

Official sources and review

Provisions used (5)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
Supreme Court Rules 2024, rule 23(5)Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Supreme Court Rules 2024, rules 6–8Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
UKSC PD2.3–2.5 and filing and service guidanceCheck the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
UKSC PD4.37–4.38, cross-appeal commencementCheck the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
UKSC PD 4.37–4.38Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.