England and Wales · Family, criminal and employment
What period and facts govern care proceedings timetable in England and Wales?
Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
- Period
- Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension
- Trigger
- The date the application was issued
- Rule
- Children Act 1989 section 32
The retained Children Act 1989 section 32 supports set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application. Its complete-body snapshot and operative extract preserve the source edition, while the period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
Children Act 1989 section 32. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine. This source guide provides no computed date or paid record.
Children Act 1989 section 32What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What period and facts govern care proceedings timetable in England and Wales?
Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
Responsible actor. The court managing an application for a care or supervision order.
The date the application was issued
The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
The court managing an application for a care or supervision order. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
Children Act 1989 section 32How does this provision count time?
- Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension
- Set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application.
- The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension; retain Children Act 1989 section 32’s source wording and the actual statutory event instead of importing a different court-procedure count.
The court controls the care-case disposal timetable and any necessary extension. A closed office cannot become a party filing extension or establish that routine extensions are permitted.
Children Act 1989 section 32Which facts prevent one automatic date?
Children Act 1989 section 32. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine. This source guide provides no computed date or paid record.
The court managing an application for a care or supervision order has records of the date the application was issued. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. Set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine. Establish this procedure’s complete source facts before choosing an endpoint.
The proposed care proceedings timetable step meets a disputed communication, closed receiving office or uncertain hearing event. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension; retain Children Act 1989 section 32’s source wording and the actual statutory event instead of importing a different court-procedure count. The court controls the care-case disposal timetable and any necessary extension. A closed office cannot become a party filing extension or establish that routine extensions are permitted. Verify the legally completed care proceedings timetable act and actual applicable calendar. No assumed closure extension or substitute date is computed.
The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine. The date the application was issued. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. Set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application. Resolve this source-specific qualification before relying on a result.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actor and completed care proceedings timetable act
- The court managing an application for a care or supervision order. Set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application.
- Actual care proceedings timetable event and branch
- The date the application was issued. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
- Counting and completion of care proceedings timetable
- Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension; retain Children Act 1989 section 32’s source wording and the actual statutory event instead of importing a different court-procedure count. The court controls the care-case disposal timetable and any necessary extension. A closed office cannot become a party filing extension or establish that routine extensions are permitted.
- The court managing an application for a care or supervision order. Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
- Care proceedings timetable concerns set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application. Its actual source event is the date the application was issued.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What period and facts govern care proceedings timetable in England and Wales?
What period governs care proceedings timetable?
Dispose without delay and in any event within twenty-six weeks beginning with issue, subject to an actual necessary extension. The period is a court case timetable, not a party filing deadline. Extensions must be necessary to resolve the case justly and cannot be routine.
Children Act 1989 section 32Which event controls care proceedings timetable?
The date the application was issued. Keep evidence of that actual source event.
Children Act 1989 section 32What completes care proceedings timetable?
Set and manage the timetable for disposal of the application. The court managing an application for a care or supervision order must establish that completed step.
Children Act 1989 section 32Can parties assume an eight-week extension?
Section 32 requires an actual court decision. An extension cannot be routine and each grant is limited by the statutory eight-week structure.
Children Act 1989 section 32Does the child’s welfare affect the timetable?
The court must consider the impact of its timetable or extension on the child’s welfare and the identified case factors.
Children Act 1989 section 32Does the twenty-six-week period begin when the application is served?
Section 32 uses issue of the application. Preserve that event rather than substituting service or the first hearing.
Children Act 1989 section 32Official sources and review
Provisions used (1)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Children Act 1989 section 32 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |