England and Wales · Land Registration
When must the Property Chamber be asked for appeal permission?
Rule 52 ordinarily gives twenty-eight days after the latest qualifying sending event for written reasons, amended reasons or review correction, or an unsuccessful timely set-aside application. Identify the event that actually qualifies before counting.
- Period
- Rule 52 ordinarily gives twenty-eight days after the latest qualifying sending event for written reasons, amended reasons or review correction, or an unsuccessful timely set-aside application. Identify the event that actually qualifies before counting.
- Trigger
- The latest qualifying reasons, review-correction or unsuccessful timely set-aside sending event
- Rule
- Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52
Reviewed against the retained current Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52 and its recorded official acquisition. The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension. First-tier permission precedes the Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber refusal application. Those stages use different events and periods.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must the Property Chamber be asked for appeal permission?
Rule 52 ordinarily gives twenty-eight days after the latest qualifying sending event for written reasons, amended reasons or review correction, or an unsuccessful timely set-aside application. Identify the event that actually qualifies before counting.
Responsible actor. The party asking the First-tier Tribunal for permission to appeal.
The latest qualifying reasons, review-correction or unsuccessful timely set-aside sending event.
The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension.
The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52How does this provision count time?
- Rule 52 ordinarily gives twenty-eight days after the latest qualifying sending event for written reasons, amended reasons or review correction, or an unsuccessful timely set-aside application. Identify the event that actually qualifies before counting.
- The permission application must be received by the Tribunal. A late application requires a reasoned extension request and cannot be admitted unless time is extended.
- First-tier permission precedes the Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber refusal application. Those stages use different events and periods.
For land registration tribunal permission to appeal guide, establish the latest qualifying reasons, review-correction or unsuccessful timely set-aside sending event before applying any stated period. Rule 52 ordinarily gives twenty-eight days after the latest qualifying sending event for written reasons, amended reasons or review correction, or an unsuccessful timely set-aside application. Identify the event that actually qualifies before counting.
For land registration tribunal permission to appeal guide, the governing time boundary must follow the identified act and provision. The permission application must be received by the Tribunal. A late application requires a reasoned extension request and cannot be admitted unless time is extended.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Which facts prevent one automatic date?
The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension. First-tier permission precedes the Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber refusal application. Those stages use different events and periods.
Written reasons are followed by a qualifying review correction. Rule 52(2) selects the latest qualifying sending event. Use the actual later notification rather than the original reasons alone.
The unvaried permission endpoint is a nonworking day. Property Chamber rule 16 supplies the appropriate endpoint treatment. Do not assume the raw review-only rollover model is the fully qualified tribunal calculation.
A set-aside application was late and no extension was granted. Rule 52(3) limits the unsuccessful-set-aside trigger. Do not assume the later refusal restarts permission time.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Required event and category
- The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension.
- Act and final boundary
- The permission application must be received by the Tribunal. A late application requires a reasoned extension request and cannot be admitted unless time is extended.
- Separate connected procedure
- First-tier permission precedes the Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber refusal application. Those stages use different events and periods.
- The party seeks permission from the First-tier Tribunal in the land-registration case. The unsuccessful-set-aside limb requires compliance with rule 51 time or an allowed extension.
- First-tier permission precedes the Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber refusal application. Those stages use different events and periods.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must the Property Chamber be asked for appeal permission?
Does the bare decision date always start rule 52 time?
No. Rule 52(2) specifies qualifying sending events and requires the latest applicable one.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Can a corrected reasons notification be relevant?
Yes. The amended-reasons or review-correction limb can supply the operative later event.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Does every unsuccessful set-aside application create a new permission period?
No. Rule 52(3) requires a timely set-aside application or an allowed extension.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Is the permission application a dispatch deadline?
No. Rule 52(4) addresses the application not being received in time.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52What must accompany a late permission application?
A request to extend time and the reason for late receipt under rule 52(4)(a).
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Can the Tribunal admit the late application without extending time?
No. Rule 52(4)(b) requires nonadmission unless the Tribunal extends time.
Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52Official sources and review
Provisions used (4)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 52 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 16 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 6 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Property Chamber Rules 2013, rule 51 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |