England and Wales · Pre-action and procurement procedures
When must the insurer or MIB send an RTA Portal CNF response?
For a claim within the low-value RTA Protocol, the insurer must complete and send the CNF response within 15 business days. The qualifying MIB route uses 30 business days. Day one is the first business day after the operative CNF sending event. Confirm the recipient, protocol version and any required resending before counting. This source guide gives no automated or purchasable deadline.
- Period
- 15 business days under paragraph 6.11; 30 business days under paragraph 6.13 for the qualifying MIB route
- Trigger
- The legally operative CNF sending event to the correct recipient, including a qualifying corrected-recipient or required reference-number resend
- Rule
- RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.11 and 6.13–6.14
Official consolidated Justice UK protocol text retrieved and individually reviewed. Historical accidents or CNFs may require an earlier protocol version. This review does not authenticate a historical text from the current page.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
The protocol fixes business-day response periods, but the current generic market model counts calendar days. Required recipient and resending facts also need to be established. The reviewed source guide therefore gives no automatic date or paid deadline record.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.11 and 6.13–6.14What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must the insurer or MIB send an RTA Portal CNF response?
For a claim within the low-value RTA Protocol, the insurer must complete and send the CNF response within 15 business days. The qualifying MIB route uses 30 business days. Day one is the first business day after the operative CNF sending event. Confirm the recipient, protocol version and any required resending before counting. This source guide gives no automated or purchasable deadline.
Responsible actor. The defendant acting through the insurer, or the MIB or its agent in the qualifying uninsured route, sending the substantive CNF response to the claimant.
Identify the applicable RTA Protocol version. Paragraph 4.1 governs its current accident and valuation scope. Paragraph 4.2 preserves earlier versions for specified pre-May 31, 2021 accidents and pre-July 31, 2013 CNFs.
Confirm the substantive CNF was sent to the insurer under paragraph 6.1. The separately posted Defendant Only CNF and the insurer’s acknowledgement do not replace that sending event.
Under paragraph 5.2, a CNF sent to the wrong defendant may be sent to the correct defendant. Preserve both transmissions and use the operative corrected sending event.
Under paragraph 6.3A(2), a defendant may require resending with the missing askCUEPI reference. That required resend starts the response period. If the defendant does not require it, paragraph 6.3A(3) preserves the ordinary response duty.
The 30-day MIB route requires no identified insurer and a claim falling to the MIB or its agents. Paragraph 4.5 excludes the Untraced Drivers’ Agreement route. Do not infer 30 days merely from an uninsured or unidentified vehicle.
The low-value RTA Claims Portal Stage 1 response only. Establish that this Protocol applies, including the accident date, valuation and small-claims boundary. This is not the RTA Small Claims Protocol, every uninsured accident, a personal-injury limitation date or an ordinary court defence deadline.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.11 and 6.13–6.14How does this provision count time?
- Establish protocol scope, version, recipient and the operative sending event.
- Identify the first following business day and count that day as day one.
- Count 15 business days for the insurer or 30 for the qualifying MIB route.
- Exclude every weekend, relevant bank holiday, Good Friday and Christmas Day.
- Check any required resend, response content and actual transmission evidence.
- Keep limitation, protocol exit and later litigation separate from this response count.
The first business day after the operative sending event is day one. Count only business days. The protocol excludes Saturdays, Sundays, bank holidays under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, Good Friday and Christmas Day. These conditional illustrations establish England and Wales holiday facts. Do not exclude day one twice or apply the CPR five-day short-period threshold.
Exclude every nonbusiness day inside the period, not just a closed final day. These are communications between parties, not acts at a court office. A court-office closure or unavailable Portal does not by itself establish an extra protocol day. Preserve the actual sending evidence and review any exceptional event separately.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.11 and 6.13–6.14Which facts prevent one automatic date?
The protocol fixes business-day response periods, but the current generic market model counts calendar days. Required recipient and resending facts also need to be established. The reviewed source guide therefore gives no automatic date or paid deadline record.
An in-scope current RTA insurer CNF was sent to the correct insurer on August 7, 2026. No required resend or exit event applies. England and Wales holiday facts are established. The first business day after sending is day one. Count 15 eligible days and exclude every intervening defined nonworking day. Conditional source illustration only. The stated 15-day period ends August 28, 2026. The application must refuse an automated result.
No insurer is identified and the established claim falls to the MIB under paragraph 6.13, rather than the Untraced Drivers’ Agreement. The operative CNF was sent August 7, 2026. No resend or exit applies. The first business day after sending is day one. Count 30 eligible days and exclude every intervening defined nonworking day. Conditional source illustration only. The stated 30-day period ends September 21, 2026. The application must refuse an automated result.
The operative in-scope insurer CNF was sent Thursday April 2, 2026. Good Friday, Easter Monday and each weekend are excluded. No reset or exit applies. The first business day after sending is day one. Count 15 eligible days and exclude every intervening defined nonworking day. Conditional source illustration only. The stated 15-day period ends April 27, 2026. The application must refuse an automated result.
An in-scope CNF was first sent August 7, 2026 without the required askCUEPI reference. The defendant demanded correction under 6.3A(2), and the corrected CNF was sent August 11. Count from the required resend. The required August 11 resend is operative under 6.3A(2). August 12 is business day one. Do not keep the original August 7 event or exclude the first following business day twice. Conditional source illustration only. The stated 15-day period ends September 2, 2026. The application must refuse an automated result.
An uninsured or unidentified vehicle is alleged, but the applicable MIB agreement and identified-recipient facts are not established. Establish paragraph 6.13 eligibility and the paragraph 4.5 Untraced Drivers’ Agreement exclusion before selecting 30 days. No applicable automatic date is established. Establish paragraph 6.13 eligibility and the paragraph 4.5 Untraced Drivers’ Agreement exclusion before selecting 30 days.
A CNF lacked the askCUEPI reference, but the defendant did not require a resend. The claimant later repeated the CNF. Paragraph 6.3A(3) preserves the ordinary response duty. Do not assume the repeated sending establishes a fresh period. No applicable automatic date is established. Paragraph 6.3A(3) preserves the ordinary response duty. Do not assume the repeated sending establishes a fresh period.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Current and historical scope
- Confirm the full current scope in paragraph 4.1, the special child-whiplash branch in 4.1A, exclusions in 4.5 and the preserved versions in 4.2. A low-value injury does not automatically belong in this Portal. The separate RTA Small Claims Protocol has its own process.
- Required CNF correction
- Wrong-recipient correction under 5.2 and a demanded missing-reference resend under 6.3A(2) can establish a later operative event. An unsolicited resend or a missing reference that the defendant did not require to be corrected does not automatically reset time.
- Response periods cannot be varied by agreement
- Paragraph 5.5 excludes both response periods from its power to vary periods by agreement. Paragraph 6.14 expressly provides no extension when the MIB passes the claim to an insurer acting for it.
- Protocol exit differs from default judgment
- Paragraph 6.15 identifies exit where the response is not completed and sent, liability is not admitted, specified information or allocation issues arise, or contributory negligence is alleged other than the stated admitted seat-belt exception. Silence is not an automatic admission or judgment.
- Limitation still needs protection
- Paragraph 5.7 permits proceedings and an application for a stay where compliance cannot finish before limitation. The Portal response period does not suspend limitation. Paragraph 5.11 prevents a claim that has left this Protocol from re-entering.
- The low-value RTA Claims Portal Stage 1 response only. Establish that this Protocol applies, including the accident date, valuation and small-claims boundary. This is not the RTA Small Claims Protocol, every uninsured accident, a personal-injury limitation date or an ordinary court defence deadline.
- The 15-day insurer and 30-day MIB options concern the same Stage 1 response within this Protocol. EL/PL response periods, RTA Small Claims responses, acknowledgement, limitation and Stage 2 are distinct questions.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must the insurer or MIB send an RTA Portal CNF response?
Does this deadline apply to Official Injury Claim or every whiplash claim?
No. Establish the applicable protocol under paragraphs 4.1–4.5. The RTA Small Claims Protocol is a separate procedure. Accident date, value, party status and the child-whiplash branch can change the route.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 4.1–4.5; RTA Small Claims ProtocolIs the first business day after sending counted or excluded?
It is day one under paragraph 5.4. Exclude the sending date, then count the first following business day. Excluding that business day again would add an unsupported day.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 1.1(2)–(3), 5.3–5.5Do weekends and bank holidays inside the 15 or 30 days count?
No. Paragraph 5.3 makes fixed day periods business-day periods. Paragraph 1.1(3) excludes Saturdays, Sundays, bank holidays, Good Friday and Christmas Day throughout the count.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 1.1(2)–(3), 5.3–5.5Does a corrected or repeated CNF always restart time?
No. Paragraph 5.2 addresses the wrong-defendant correction. Paragraph 6.3A(2) addresses a defendant-required missing-reference resend. If no such resend is required, paragraph 6.3A(3) preserves the ordinary duty. Establish the actual applicable event.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.2 and 6.3ACan the parties extend the response period or restart it when the MIB appoints an insurer?
Paragraph 5.5 excludes the 15 and 30-day response periods from agreed variation. Under paragraph 6.14, an insurer acting for the MIB receives no extension of the existing MIB period.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.5 and 6.14Does a late response mean the claimant automatically wins?
No. Paragraph 6.15 deals with leaving this Protocol, rather than automatic judgment. Paragraph 6.17 identifies the next pre-action procedure. Limitation remains separate, and paragraph 5.7 addresses protective proceedings and a stay.
RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.7 and 6.15–6.17Official sources and review
Provisions used (12)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.11 and 6.13–6.14 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 1.1(2)–(3), 5.3–5.5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 4.1–4.5, 5.1–5.2, 6.1–6.3A and 6.15–6.17 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Small Claims Protocol, separate procedure | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 4.1–4.5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.2 and 6.3A(2)–(3) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.5 and 6.14 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 6.15–6.17 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.7–5.8 and 5.11 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 4.1–4.5; RTA Small Claims Protocol | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.2 and 6.3A | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| RTA Protocol, paragraphs 5.7 and 6.15–6.17 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |