Skip to main content

England and Wales · Tribunals and tax

What period and facts govern upper tribunal review of ftt decision in England and Wales?

Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication
Trigger
The challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal
Rule
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

The upper tribunal review of ftt decision guide uses complete official response bodies retained with acquisition identities. Current legislative XML can include temporal, territorial and transitional alternatives. Actual applicability remains provision-specific; no source-calibrated numeric model is qualified by this guide.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction. The upper tribunal review of ftt decision source guide provides no computed date or paid calculation.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

What period and facts govern upper tribunal review of ftt decision in England and Wales?

Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

Responsible actor. An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction.

The challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal

The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

How does this provision count time?

  1. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication
  2. Deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties.
  3. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The applicable chamber’s time provision requires completion by 5 p.m. and ordinarily allows the next working day for a nonworking final day. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion.

For upper tribunal review of ftt decision, establish the actual Tribunal calendar, recipient, permitted delivery and any specific direction. Preserve the distinction between a sending anchor and required receipt. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction. The upper tribunal review of ftt decision source guide provides no computed date or paid calculation.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction has records of the challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. Deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction. Establish the complete upper tribunal review of ftt decision procedure before choosing an endpoint.

The proposed upper tribunal review of ftt decision completion falls on a nonworking day or encounters a disputed sending or delivery event. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The applicable chamber’s time provision requires completion by 5 p.m. and ordinarily allows the next working day for a nonworking final day. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion. For upper tribunal review of ftt decision, establish the actual Tribunal calendar, recipient, permitted delivery and any specific direction. Preserve the distinction between a sending anchor and required receipt. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion. Establish effective upper tribunal review of ftt decision completion under its actual source. No assumed closure extension or substitute date is computed.

The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction. The challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. Deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties. Preserve this upper tribunal review of ftt decision qualification rather than converting incomplete facts into a final date.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Actor and completed upper tribunal review of ftt decision step
An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction. Deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties.
Operative upper tribunal review of ftt decision event and branch
The challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.
Counting and completion of upper tribunal review of ftt decision
Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The applicable chamber’s time provision requires completion by 5 p.m. and ordinarily allows the next working day for a nonworking final day. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion. For upper tribunal review of ftt decision, establish the actual Tribunal calendar, recipient, permitted delivery and any specific direction. Preserve the distinction between a sending anchor and required receipt. Upper Tribunal rule 12 has special school-case exclusions and an additional December 27 to 31 immigration working-day exclusion.
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28
  • An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction. Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.
  • Upper Tribunal review of FTT decision concerns deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties. Its the challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal cannot be replaced by another chamber’s permission clock or a different HMRC tax procedure.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

What period and facts govern upper tribunal review of ftt decision in England and Wales?

What period governs upper tribunal review of ftt decision?

Apply promptly and ordinarily within three months; rule 28(3) can permit later filing within one month after the specified First-tier Tribunal communication. The one-month provision permits filing later than the ordinary period. It is not a universal shortening to one month or proof of judicial review jurisdiction.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Which event controls upper tribunal review of ftt decision?

The challenged decision, action or omission, together with later First-tier Tribunal reasons or eligible set-aside refusal. Preserve that actual source event before selecting this procedure.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

What completes upper tribunal review of ftt decision?

Deliver the written permission application so the Upper Tribunal receives it, identifying the decision, grounds, outcome and relevant parties. An applicant within the Upper Tribunal’s judicial review jurisdiction must establish that particular completed step.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Does the one-month FTT provision replace the three-month rule?

Rule 28(3) expressly permits an application later than paragraph (2) where its communication and timing conditions apply. Promptness and jurisdiction remain material.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Does any set-aside refusal activate the later application limb?

Only an unsuccessful First-tier Tribunal set-aside application made in time meets rule 28(3)(b). Preserve its original application date.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Must the application identify other affected parties?

Rule 28(5) requires each other party to the underlying court or tribunal proceedings to be named as an interested party unless already a respondent.

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28

Official sources and review

Provisions used (5)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 28Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 12Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 5Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 section 15Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 rule 1Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.