Hong Kong · civil procedure
What period applies to pleadings close after reply?
14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Identify deemed closure of pleadings. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
- Period
- 14 days after the applicable final pleading service
- Trigger
- Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists
- Rule
- Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)
Official verified English consolidated chapter 4A, version October 1,2025. Acquired October 9, 2026, with the official current register and immutable verified PDF. Current verified official English consolidated chapter PDFs acquired October 9, 2026. Version dates retained per chapter register. No claim that a calendar proves future gale, black-rainstorm or emergency office closures.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What period applies to pleadings close after reply?
14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Identify deemed closure of pleadings. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
Responsible actor. Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence.
Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists
14 days after the applicable final pleading service
Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Actual reply or only defence to counterclaim; Complete pleading history; No different procedural order; Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction. If neither pleading is served, Order 18 rule 20(1)(b) uses twenty-eight days after defence service instead.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)How does this provision count time?
- Identify deemed closure of pleadings
- Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence uses the established effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists. 14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. The ordinary illustration avoids an unresolved interaction between summer omission for procedural acts and the separate status boundary.
- Identify deemed closure of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
- Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence uses the established effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists. 14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. The ordinary illustration avoids an unresolved interaction between summer omission for procedural acts and the separate status boundary.
Identify deemed closure of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)What do independently checked examples show?
Fictitious example
Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Ordinary Branch Does Not Cross Summer Vacation true.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example 1. Ordinary established facts | Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Ordinary Branch Does Not Cross Summer Vacation true. 14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2). | Friday, October 23, 2026 |
| Example 2. Closed-day boundary | Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists occurs on Monday, October 5, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Ordinary Branch Does Not Cross Summer Vacation true. 14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2). | Monday, October 19, 2026 |
| Example 3. Material procedural branch | Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The complete eligibility and procedural facts are not established. Ordinary Branch Does Not Cross Summer Vacation not established. This actual branch must be established independently before any ordinary endpoint can be used. Actual reply or only defence to counterclaim | If neither pleading is served, Order 18 rule 20(1)(b) uses twenty-eight days after defence service instead. |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual reply or only defence to counterclaim
- Actual reply or only defence to counterclaim
- Complete pleading history
- Complete pleading history
- No different procedural order
- No different procedural order
- Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction
- Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction
- Correct source counting and completion route
- Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence uses the established effective reply service, or counterclaim-defence service where no reply exists. 14 days after the applicable final pleading service. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. The ordinary illustration avoids an unresolved interaction between summer omission for procedural acts and the separate status boundary. Identify deemed closure of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Outstanding particulars do not postpone deemed closure under rule 20(2).
- Parties whose pleadings include a reply or only a counterclaim defence. Actual reply or only defence to counterclaim; Complete pleading history; No different procedural order; Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction. If neither pleading is served, Order 18 rule 20(1)(b) uses twenty-eight days after defence service instead.
- If neither pleading is served, Order 18 rule 20(1)(b) uses twenty-eight days after defence service instead.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What period applies to pleadings close after reply?
Which pleading starts the fourteen-day closure interval?
The reply, or the defence to counterclaim if there is no reply, under Order 18 rule 20(1)(a).
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)Does a request for particulars hold pleadings open?
No. Rule 20(2) says deemed closure occurs despite an unfulfilled request or order for particulars.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)Must a party file a notice to close pleadings?
Rule 20 describes a deemed status. It does not require a separate closure notice.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)What if neither reply nor counterclaim defence was served?
Use rule 20(1)(b)’s twenty-eight-day interval after defence service, not this fourteen-day branch.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)Does Court-office carry automatically alter deemed closure?
Do not treat closure as a Registry filing act. A status date and a later filing deadline require separate analysis.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)Does this establish the discovery deadline?
No. Deemed closure is the event for a separate discovery period. Check discovery exclusions and actual orders.
Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a)Official sources and review
Provisions used (5)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A), Order 18, rule 20(1)(a) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Rules of the High Court (Cap.4A), Order3 rules1–5 and Order64 rule1 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| High Court Ordinance (Cap.4), section31(1), including its endorsed-writ proviso | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance (Cap.1), section71(1)–(2) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| General Holidays Ordinance (Cap.149), section3 and Schedule | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |