Hong Kong · civil procedure
What period applies to district court pleading closure?
14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Identify deemed close of pleadings. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
- Period
- 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence
- Trigger
- Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service
- Rule
- Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)
Official verified English consolidated chapter 336H, version March 28,2025. Acquired October 9, 2026, with the official current register and immutable verified PDF. Current verified official English consolidated chapter PDFs acquired October 9, 2026. Version dates retained per chapter register. No claim that a calendar proves future gale, black-rainstorm or emergency office closures.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What period applies to district court pleading closure?
14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Identify deemed close of pleadings. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
Responsible actor. Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch.
Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service
14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence
Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Complete pleading history; Actual branch and service event; No contrary operative order; Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction. A raw twenty-eight-day default misstates the fourteen-day reply branch. Outstanding particulars do not defer closure.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)How does this provision count time?
- Identify deemed close of pleadings
- Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch uses the established reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service. 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. District Court Order3 has no High Court pleading summer-omission rule. Do not transfer the August omission merely because the procedures have similar names.
- Identify deemed close of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
- Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch uses the established reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service. 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. District Court Order3 has no High Court pleading summer-omission rule. Do not transfer the August omission merely because the procedures have similar names.
Identify deemed close of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)What do independently checked examples show?
Fictitious example
Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Reply Served Friday, October 9, 2026. No Other Controlling Pleading true.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example 1. Ordinary established facts | Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Reply Served Friday, October 9, 2026. No Other Controlling Pleading true. 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch. | Friday, October 23, 2026 |
| Example 2. Closed-day boundary | Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service occurs on Monday, October 5, 2026. The retained eligibility and ordinary procedural conditions apply. Reply Served Monday, October 5, 2026. No Other Controlling Pleading true. 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch. | Monday, October 19, 2026 |
| Example 3. Material procedural branch | Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service occurs on Friday, October 9, 2026. The complete eligibility and procedural facts are not established. Reply Served not established. No Other Controlling Pleading not established. This actual branch must be established independently before any ordinary endpoint can be used. Complete pleading history | A raw twenty-eight-day default misstates the fourteen-day reply branch. Outstanding particulars do not defer closure. |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions and exceptions apply?
- Complete pleading history
- Complete pleading history
- Actual branch and service event
- Actual branch and service event
- No contrary operative order
- No contrary operative order
- Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction
- Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction
- Correct source counting and completion route
- Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch uses the established reply or only counterclaim-defence service; otherwise defence service. 14 days for reply branch; 28 days where neither reply nor counterclaim defence. Exclude the effective event day. Ordinary intervening weekends remain counted unless an applicable source provision excludes them. District Court Order3 has no High Court pleading summer-omission rule. Do not transfer the August omission merely because the procedures have similar names. Identify deemed close of pleadings. An office calendar does not automatically change this service, deemed-event, minimum-interval or status boundary. The source and the actual completion route control. Closure is a status and cannot be inferred without the actual pleading branch.
- Parties identifying the actual District Court closure branch. Complete pleading history; Actual branch and service event; No contrary operative order; Ordinary status branch does not cross an unresolved summer procedural-act/status interaction. A raw twenty-eight-day default misstates the fourteen-day reply branch. Outstanding particulars do not defer closure.
- A raw twenty-eight-day default misstates the fourteen-day reply branch. Outstanding particulars do not defer closure.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What period applies to district court pleading closure?
Does District Court closure always take twenty-eight days?
No. Order 18 rule 20(1)(a) specifies fourteen days after reply or, with no reply, defence to counterclaim.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)When does the twenty-eight-day branch apply?
Only where neither reply nor defence to counterclaim is served under paragraph (1)(b).
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)Do unanswered particulars stop closure?
No. Paragraph (2) preserves deemed closure despite an outstanding request or order.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)Does filing date replace service date?
The rule uses service of the applicable pleading.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)Is closing pleadings an act at the Registry?
The provision describes deemed status, not a separate Registry application.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)Does closure automatically establish discovery eligibility?
No. The subsequent discovery rule has its own party-specific conditions and exclusions.
Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1)Official sources and review
Provisions used (4)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H), Order 18, rule 20(1) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Rules of the District Court (Cap.336H), Order3 rules1,2,4 and5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance (Cap.1), section71(1)–(2) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| General Holidays Ordinance (Cap.149), section3 and Schedule | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |