Privy Council · Current and transitional procedure
What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?
Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
- Period
- Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed
- Trigger
- The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47
- Rule
- JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54
The costs assessment review guide uses the retained current 2024 Rules and maintained official practice directions, including the September 2026 updates. Rule 63 separately preserves qualifying proceedings begun or filed before December 2, 2024 unless otherwise directed. Non-portal filing alone does not establish that transition.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Confirm the actual costs assessment review route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?
Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
Responsible actor. The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision.
The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47
This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54How does this provision count time?
- Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed
- File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle.
- This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed.
For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54Which facts prevent one automatic date?
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Confirm the actual costs assessment review route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.
The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision has evidence of the end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Establish the actual costs assessment review facts before selecting a final date.
The proposed costs assessment review endpoint meets a Registry closure or a service alert outside office hours. For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation. Identify the precise costs assessment review act and place. A Registry carry and an effective service date are separate questions.
This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. The source contract for costs assessment review requires the end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. Do not replace the missing source facts with a raw catalog period.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actor and completed costs assessment review step
- The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle.
- Controlling costs assessment review event and branch
- The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
- Counting and completion for costs assessment review
- For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.
- The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
- Costs assessment review concerns the party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision and file the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. Claim for costs is a distinct step and does not establish this procedure’s actor, event or completed act.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?
What time limit governs costs assessment review?
Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54Which event starts or anchors costs assessment review?
The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision must identify this event in the actual case records.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54What completes costs assessment review?
File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54Can every disputed costs amount be appealed through this review?
PD 9.47 confines review to a question of principle, rather than the amount allowed for an item.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Does the 14-day costs-review anchor mean later receipt of a bill?
PD 9.47 uses the end of the detailed assessment. The provisional-assessment receipt route is separate.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Who considers the review of the Costs Officer?
PD 9.46 provides for review by a single member through the procedural application route.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.46Official sources and review
Provisions used (8)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC current PD paragraph 9.46 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 35 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 6 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 7 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 8 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 63 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |