Skip to main content

Privy Council · Current and transitional procedure

What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?

Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed
Trigger
The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47
Rule
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

The costs assessment review guide uses the retained current 2024 Rules and maintained official practice directions, including the September 2026 updates. Rule 63 separately preserves qualifying proceedings begun or filed before December 2, 2024 unless otherwise directed. Non-portal filing alone does not establish that transition.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Confirm the actual costs assessment review route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?

Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

Responsible actor. The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision.

The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47

This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

How does this provision count time?

  1. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed
  2. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle.
  3. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed.

For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Confirm the actual costs assessment review route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision has evidence of the end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. Establish the actual costs assessment review facts before selecting a final date.

The proposed costs assessment review endpoint meets a Registry closure or a service alert outside office hours. For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation. Identify the precise costs assessment review act and place. A Registry carry and an effective service date are separate questions.

This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item. The source contract for costs assessment review requires the end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. Do not replace the missing source facts with a raw catalog period.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Actor and completed costs assessment review step
The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle.
Controlling costs assessment review event and branch
The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
Counting and completion for costs assessment review
For costs assessment review, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs assessment review, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54
  • The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision. Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.
  • Costs assessment review concerns the party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision and file the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. Claim for costs is a distinct step and does not establish this procedure’s actor, event or completed act.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

What time limit and facts govern costs assessment review before the Privy Council?

What time limit governs costs assessment review?

Apply within 14 days of that end, or the longer period actually fixed. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

Which event starts or anchors costs assessment review?

The end of the detailed assessment under PD 9.47. The party seeking review of a Costs Officer’s decision must identify this event in the actual case records.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

What completes costs assessment review?

File the procedural review application stating concise grounds on a question of principle. This route does not permit a review merely of the amount allowed for an individual item.

JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54

Can every disputed costs amount be appealed through this review?

PD 9.47 confines review to a question of principle, rather than the amount allowed for an item.

JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47

Does the 14-day costs-review anchor mean later receipt of a bill?

PD 9.47 uses the end of the detailed assessment. The provisional-assessment receipt route is separate.

JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47

Who considers the review of the Costs Officer?

PD 9.46 provides for review by a single member through the procedural application route.

JCPC current PD paragraph 9.46

Official sources and review

Provisions used (8)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.46Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 35Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 6Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 7Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 8Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
JCPC Rules 2024 rule 63Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.