Privy Council · Current and transitional procedure
What time limit and facts govern costs review objection before the Privy Council?
File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
- Period
- File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed
- Trigger
- Filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47
- Rule
- JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47
The costs review objection guide uses the retained current 2024 Rules and maintained official practice directions, including the September 2026 updates. Rule 63 separately preserves qualifying proceedings begun or filed before December 2, 2024 unless otherwise directed. Non-portal filing alone does not establish that transition.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor. Confirm the actual costs review objection route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What time limit and facts govern costs review objection before the Privy Council?
File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
Responsible actor. The party opposing a costs-review application.
Filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47
This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
The party opposing a costs-review application. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47How does this provision count time?
- File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed
- State and file the opposition to the principle-based review.
- This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
For costs review objection, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed.
For costs review objection, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Which facts prevent one automatic date?
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor. Confirm the actual costs review objection route and completion facts before selecting an endpoint. This guide gives no calculated date or paid calculation.
The party opposing a costs-review application has evidence of filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. State and file the opposition to the principle-based review. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor. Establish the actual costs review objection facts before selecting a final date.
The proposed costs review objection endpoint meets a Registry closure or a service alert outside office hours. For costs review objection, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs review objection, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation. Identify the precise costs review objection act and place. A Registry carry and an effective service date are separate questions.
This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor. The source contract for costs review objection requires filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47. State and file the opposition to the principle-based review. Do not replace the missing source facts with a raw catalog period.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actor and completed costs review objection step
- The party opposing a costs-review application. State and file the opposition to the principle-based review.
- Controlling costs review objection event and branch
- Filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
- Counting and completion for costs review objection
- For costs review objection, retain the source’s exact event and unit. Rule 7 distinguishes electronic filing from actual tracked delivery, while Rule 8 separates portal email-alert service during office hours from its next-business-day treatment outside those hours. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. For costs review objection, Rule 6(4)(a) carries an act done at the Registry to the next open day when its last day is closed. Rule 6(4)(b) uses midnight in the place where the person acts. These provisions do not make every hearing countback or service event a generic London working-day calculation.
- The party opposing a costs-review application. File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
- Costs review objection concerns the party opposing a costs-review application and state and file the opposition to the principle-based review. Claim for costs is a distinct step and does not establish this procedure’s actor, event or completed act.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What time limit and facts govern costs review objection before the Privy Council?
What time limit governs costs review objection?
File objection within 14 days from that filing, or the longer period actually fixed. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Which event starts or anchors costs review objection?
Filing of the review application under maintained PD 9.47. The party opposing a costs-review application must identify this event in the actual case records.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47What completes costs review objection?
State and file the opposition to the principle-based review. This direction’s filing anchor must not be automatically replaced with the general procedural-application service anchor.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Does a costs-review objection always run from service?
PD 9.47 expressly describes 14 days from filing the review application. General Rule 35(4) uses service for procedural objections, so preserve the specific direction.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Can the Court allow a longer costs-review objection period?
PD 9.47 permits a longer period fixed by the Court. The actual direction, rather than a request alone, establishes it.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Should opposition argue only about an individual item’s amount?
The review is limited to questions of principle. Opposition should address that permitted scope rather than assume a full reassessment.
JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47Official sources and review
Provisions used (7)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| JCPC current PD paragraph 9.47 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 35 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 54 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 6 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 7 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 8 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| JCPC Rules 2024 rule 63 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |