When must I request review of a Housing and Property Chamber decision?

Rule 39 ordinarily requires a written review application within 14 days of the decision or within 14 days of sending its written reasons. Copy the other parties and explain why review is necessary. Excluded decisions and actual time directions remain separate checks.

Responsible actor. Party requesting a permissible tribunal review.

Identify actual decision or subsequent sending of written reasons.

Check rule 37(3)(b) through(j) and the section 92 registration-appeal exclusion. The tribunal’s rule 16A powers can alter time. A review does not suspend the separate 30-day permission-to-appeal period.

Confirm the actual source event, exact branch, current regime and completion route. Only the established ordinary period is calculated.

1. Exclude the established decision or reasons-sending day and count 14 calendar days. Use the current fresh decision if an earlier decision was revised on review.
2. Confirm the actual statutory or tribunal completion route and its cutoff.

Exclude the established decision or reasons-sending day and count 14 calendar days. Use the current fresh decision if an earlier decision was revised on review.

Count calendar days. No automatic weekend, holiday or discretionary extension is inferred. Check the actual completion route and cutoff; earlier action may be necessary.

Fictitious example

Fictional facts. actual decision or subsequent sending of written reasons is established as Tuesday, October 13, 2026. Selected branch. The current decision was made branch applies. All ordinary source conditions and the actual completion route are established.

Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.

Source condition 1

Rule 39 applies to this Housing and Property Chamber decision. None of rule 37(3)(b) through(j) or the section 92 registration-appeal exclusion applies.

Source condition 2

I established the actual decision date or actual sending of its written reasons. For a revised decision, I identified the current fresh decision and its reasons.

Source condition 3

The application is written, copied to the other parties and states why review is necessary. Actual timely completion, including party communications, remains required.

Source condition 4

No rule 16A direction alters the ordinary 14-day period. This review does not suspend or extend the separate permission-to-appeal period.

Source condition 5

The ordinary current period applies. No different statutory period, direction, extension, suspension or late permission changes this calculation.

• Confirm the actual source event, exact branch, current regime and completion route. Only the established ordinary period is calculated.
• Related procedures have different actors, events and periods. This result does not replace a different appeal, review, notice-form or application requirement.

• Rule 39 applies to this Housing and Property Chamber decision. None of rule 37(3)(b) through(j) or the section 92 registration-appeal exclusion applies.
• I established the actual decision date or actual sending of its written reasons. For a revised decision, I identified the current fresh decision and its reasons.
• The application is written, copied to the other parties and states why review is necessary. Actual timely completion, including party communications, remains required.
• No rule 16A direction alters the ordinary 14-day period. This review does not suspend or extend the separate permission-to-appeal period.
• The ordinary current period applies. No different statutory period, direction, extension, suspension or late permission changes this calculation.
• Check rule 37(3)(b) through(j) and the section 92 registration-appeal exclusion. The tribunal’s rule 16A powers can alter time. A review does not suspend the separate 30-day permission-to-appeal period.