Skip to main content

United States · Delaware Supreme Court

How is a Delaware rapid-arbitration cross-challenge timed?

Rule 6(b)(ii) identifies the later of seven days after service of the first timely notice and fifteen days after issuance of the final award. The agreement’s review terms and effective service also matter. This one-date preset does not establish both clocks or resolve the service qualification.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
Two distinct event-and-period branches plus actual service and agreement review. The isolated preset does not reproduce the controlling cross-challenge, so no computed date is published.
Trigger
First-notice service and final-award issuance, established separately
Rule
Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)
Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)

Official Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026. That label identifies the retained compilation, not a new effective date for every civil rule.

Source guide · No automated date

How is a Delaware rapid-arbitration cross-challenge timed?

Two distinct event-and-period branches plus actual service and agreement review. The isolated preset does not reproduce the controlling cross-challenge, so no computed date is published.

Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

Which established event starts this procedure?

Rule 6(b)(ii) identifies the later of seven days after service of the first timely notice and fifteen days after issuance of the final award. The agreement’s review terms and effective service also matter. This one-date preset does not establish both clocks or resolve the service qualification.

Responsible actor. Another party seeking review in the qualifying DRAA proceeding.

Read the qualifying agreement and its appellate-review terms.

Obtain the final award and first notice.

Establish effective service and both prescribed periods before comparing their boundaries.

Confirm DRAA applicability, a timely first challenge, effective notice service and the award’s actual issuance. Review the agreement before assuming judicial cross-review remains available.

Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)

Which comparisons must be resolved before counting?

  1. First-notice service and final-award issuance, established separately
  2. Establish each event, period and procedural branch described on this page before applying Rule 11. This guide supplies no single computed date.
  3. Complete the applicable notice and attachments under Rules 6 and 7. Preserve service records, the final award and Supreme Court filing receipt.

Rule 11(a) excludes the event day. A prescribed period below seven days excludes intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Seven days and longer count those intermediate days. A final Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or actual Clerk closure receives the stated next-open-day treatment. A backward five-day motion component counts earlier eligible days to preserve its required lead. Do not apply the separate Chancery or Superior Court eleven-day threshold.

The 2026 named calendar follows the Court’s published statewide holidays. The 2027 dates are projections of 1 Del. C. § 501 and its fixed-holiday observation rule. December 31, 2027 is the observed New Year holiday for Saturday, January 1, 2028. These dates do not confirm future amendments, Governor or Chief Justice appointments or actual additional closures. Sussex Return Day afternoon is not treated as a statewide full-day Supreme Court closure. Review any actual additional closure separately.

Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s prescribed period after incoming service by mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. The addition enters the period before Rule 11(a) counting and final-day treatment. It does not apply to Court acts or to an entry, filing, issuance or acceptance event merely because a copy is served. Rule 10(b) completes mail service on mailing. Rule 10.1(h) treats authorized electronic service like mail for the addition. A convenience email notification under Rule 10.2(6)(d) is not the service event.

Reviewed coverage uses the retained Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026, for established events on or after that compilation boundary and final dates through December 31, 2027. The index label is not a new effective date for every civil rule. Historical events, backward periods crossing that boundary, later dates, changed orders and actual additional closures require separate review. No computed or paid date is supplied for an input outside that coverage. This boundary does not establish that an actual act is late.

Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)–(c)

What distinguishes these procedural branches?

Fictitious comparison. One party relies on award issuance; another examines service of the first timely challenge. Those events start different fifteen- and seven-day components. Mail or eFiling service also engages Rule 11(c). Preserve the award, timely first notice and actual service method before comparing the resulting boundaries. This guide supplies no isolated cross-challenge date.

Two distinct event-and-period branches plus actual service and agreement review. The isolated preset does not reproduce the controlling cross-challenge, so no computed date is published.

Which qualifications change this particular requirement?

Different event from civil cross-appeal
Rule 6(b)(ii) says first-notice service. Civil Rule 6(b)(i) says first-notice filing.
Service qualification needs review
Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s prescribed service-triggered period for mail or eFiling. Apply Rule 11(a) to that resulting component, then compare it with the independent award-issuance branch. The single-event preset does not perform that comparison.
Award review can be waived or replaced
Section 5809(d) permits specified review arrangements. A timely first notice does not erase the agreement’s review terms.
Participant service and Court acts
Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s prescribed period after incoming service by mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. The addition enters the period before Rule 11(a) counting and final-day treatment. It does not apply to Court acts or to an entry, filing, issuance or acceptance event merely because a copy is served. Rule 10(b) completes mail service on mailing. Rule 10.1(h) treats authorized electronic service like mail for the addition. A convenience email notification under Rule 10.2(6)(d) is not the service event.
Compilation and calendar coverage
Reviewed coverage uses the retained Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026, for established events on or after that compilation boundary and final dates through December 31, 2027. The index label is not a new effective date for every civil rule. Historical events, backward periods crossing that boundary, later dates, changed orders and actual additional closures require separate review. No computed or paid date is supplied for an input outside that coverage. This boundary does not establish that an actual act is late.
Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)
  • Confirm DRAA applicability, a timely first challenge, effective notice service and the award’s actual issuance. Review the agreement before assuming judicial cross-review remains available.
  • Two distinct event-and-period branches plus actual service and agreement review. The isolated preset does not reproduce the controlling cross-challenge, so no computed date is published.

Which acts and receipts must be completed?

Questions about this particular Supreme Court procedure

How is a Delaware rapid-arbitration cross-challenge timed?

Does choosing the later event reproduce this rule?

No. The events have different seven- and fifteen-day periods. Establish the actual legal branches and compare their boundaries.

Supr. Ct. R. 6(a), (b)Original final-award challenge

Is seven days a business-day period?

Seven days is not shorter than seven under Rule 11(a). Intermediate weekends and holidays are counted in that prescribed component.

Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)Civil cross-appeal clocks

Does this page supply a standalone seven-day due date?

No. It requires both event-and-period branches and actual effective service. No automatic cross-challenge date or paid date is supplied.

Supr. Ct. R. 11(c)Civil notice filing

Official Supreme Court sources and review

Provisions used (17)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(ii)This question’s actor, triggering event, prescribed component and procedural qualifications
Supr. Ct. R. 6(a), (b)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 11(c)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
10 Del. C. §§ 5803 and 5809The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 7(a), (c)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 10(a)–(d)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 10.2(6)(a)–(d)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 10.1(b), (h)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 10.2(10)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(i)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 6(b)(i)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(ii)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)–(c)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
1 Del. C. § 501(a)–(c)The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Delaware Courts published 2026 holidaysThe separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Official Supreme Court rules and amendmentsThe separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim
Read the official provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.