United States · Delaware Supreme Court
When may the Delaware appellee reply on its cross-appeal?
If the appellant’s reply includes cross-appeal answering matter, the appellee may serve and file a reply directed to it within ten days after service. The appellee acts as cross-appellant here. Mail or eFiling service adds three days under Rule 11(c).
- Period
- 10 days for this stated component
- Trigger
- Effective service of the appellant’s reply containing answering matter on the cross-appeal
- Rule
- Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(v)
Official Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026. That label identifies the retained compilation, not a new effective date for every civil rule.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which established event starts this procedure?
If the appellant’s reply includes cross-appeal answering matter, the appellee may serve and file a reply directed to it within ten days after service. The appellee acts as cross-appellant here. Mail or eFiling service adds three days under Rule 11(c).
Responsible actor. The appellee acting as cross-appellant and replying to the cross-answer.
Confirm the appellant’s reply actually answers this cross-appeal.
Identify the appellee’s role as cross-appellant for this further reply.
Establish effective service and any different Court schedule.
Establish a served appellant reply that contains cross-appeal answering matter. Select its effective method. This is the appellee’s further cross-appeal reply, not a second ordinary appellant reply.
Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(v)How does Supreme Court Rule 11 count this component?
- Effective service of the appellant’s reply containing answering matter on the cross-appeal
- Exclude the established event day and count the stated component under Rule 11(a). Select personal, mail or eFiling service; add Rule 11(c) days to the prescribed participant period before counting.
- Personal service uses the stated period. Mail and eFiling add three days before final-day treatment.
- Serve and file the reply directed to the cross-answer. Preserve the incoming combined reply, method-specific service evidence and the further-reply filing receipt.
Rule 11(a) excludes the event day. A prescribed period below seven days excludes intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Seven days and longer count those intermediate days. A final Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday or actual Clerk closure receives the stated next-open-day treatment. A backward five-day motion component counts earlier eligible days to preserve its required lead. Do not apply the separate Chancery or Superior Court eleven-day threshold.
The 2026 named calendar follows the Court’s published statewide holidays. The 2027 dates are projections of 1 Del. C. § 501 and its fixed-holiday observation rule. December 31, 2027 is the observed New Year holiday for Saturday, January 1, 2028. These dates do not confirm future amendments, Governor or Chief Justice appointments or actual additional closures. Sussex Return Day afternoon is not treated as a statewide full-day Supreme Court closure. Review any actual additional closure separately.
Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s prescribed period after incoming service by mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. The addition enters the period before Rule 11(a) counting and final-day treatment. It does not apply to Court acts or to an entry, filing, issuance or acceptance event merely because a copy is served. Rule 10(b) completes mail service on mailing. Rule 10.1(h) treats authorized electronic service like mail for the addition. A convenience email notification under Rule 10.2(6)(d) is not the service event.
Reviewed coverage uses the retained Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026, for established events on or after that compilation boundary and final dates through December 31, 2027. The index label is not a new effective date for every civil rule. Historical events, backward periods crossing that boundary, later dates, changed orders and actual additional closures require separate review. No computed or paid date is supplied for an input outside that coverage. This boundary does not establish that an actual act is late.
Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)–(c)What do independently derived examples show?
Fictitious example
Fictitious effective personal service, no changed order or actual additional closure. Establish a served appellant reply that contains cross-appeal answering matter. Select its effective method. This is the appellee’s further cross-appeal reply, not a second ordinary appellant reply.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Established event | Effective service of the appellant’s reply containing answering matter on the cross-appeal by personal service | September 1, 2026 |
| Ordinary component | Event on September 1, 2026. Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s service-triggered prescribed period for mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. Apply Rule 11(a) to the resulting boundary. The addition precedes final-day rollover. Nominal boundary 2026-09-11; resulting boundary 2026-09-11. | Friday, September 11, 2026 |
| Ordinary component | Event on September 1, 2026. Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s service-triggered prescribed period for mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. Apply Rule 11(a) to the resulting boundary. The addition precedes final-day rollover. Nominal boundary 2026-09-14; resulting boundary 2026-09-14. | Monday, September 14, 2026 |
| Ordinary component | Event on September 1, 2026. Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s service-triggered prescribed period for mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. Apply Rule 11(a) to the resulting boundary. The addition precedes final-day rollover. Nominal boundary 2026-09-14; resulting boundary 2026-09-14. | Monday, September 14, 2026 |
Fictitious established facts. The example does not establish applicability, actual service, completed filing, an extension, entitlement or a special closure. Establish a served appellant reply that contains cross-appeal answering matter. Select its effective method. This is the appellee’s further cross-appeal reply, not a second ordinary appellant reply.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich qualifications change this particular requirement?
- Ten is not a short period here
- Rule 11(a) excludes intermediate weekends and holidays only below seven days. The prescribed ten-day component counts them.
- Method adds before rollover
- Personal service uses ten days; mail or eFiling uses thirteen days. Apply final-day adjustment only after counting that resulting period.
- Reply is directed to the cross-answer
- Rule 15(a)(v) permits this specific further reply. Rule 15(a)(vi) does not otherwise authorize extra argumentative briefs without leave.
- Participant service and Court acts
- Rule 11(c) adds three days to a participant’s prescribed period after incoming service by mail or eFiling. Personal service adds none. The addition enters the period before Rule 11(a) counting and final-day treatment. It does not apply to Court acts or to an entry, filing, issuance or acceptance event merely because a copy is served. Rule 10(b) completes mail service on mailing. Rule 10.1(h) treats authorized electronic service like mail for the addition. A convenience email notification under Rule 10.2(6)(d) is not the service event.
- Compilation and calendar coverage
- Reviewed coverage uses the retained Supreme Court compilation current through February 2, 2026, for established events on or after that compilation boundary and final dates through December 31, 2027. The index label is not a new effective date for every civil rule. Historical events, backward periods crossing that boundary, later dates, changed orders and actual additional closures require separate review. No computed or paid date is supplied for an input outside that coverage. This boundary does not establish that an actual act is late.
- Establish a served appellant reply that contains cross-appeal answering matter. Select its effective method. This is the appellee’s further cross-appeal reply, not a second ordinary appellant reply.
- The stated component does not obtain an extension, establish completed acts or decide an excluded procedural branch.
Which acts and receipts must be completed?
Questions about this particular Supreme Court procedure
When may the Delaware appellee reply on its cross-appeal?
Is this the cross-appellee’s ordinary reply?
The rule permits the appellee to reply to the appellant’s cross-answer. Where the appellee brought the cross-appeal, it acts as cross-appellant.
Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(i)–(vi)Appellant combined reply and cross-answerDoes the original cross-appeal notice start ten days?
No. The event is service of the appellant’s reply containing cross-appeal answering matter.
Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(i)–(vi)Appellee answering-brief clockShould I skip weekends within ten days?
No. Ten days is not shorter than seven under Supreme Court Rule 11(a). This differs from the separate Chancery short-period model.
Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)Ordinary appellant replyOfficial Supreme Court sources and review
Provisions used (16)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(v) | This question’s actor, triggering event, prescribed component and procedural qualifications |
| Supr. Ct. R. 11(a) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 11(c) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(i)–(vi) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10.2(3) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10(b), (c) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10(a)–(d) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10.1(b), (h) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10.2(6)(a)–(d) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 10.2(10) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(ii) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 15(a)(iii) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Supr. Ct. R. 11(a)–(c) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| 1 Del. C. § 501(a)–(c) | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Delaware Courts published 2026 holidays | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |
| Official Supreme Court rules and amendments | The separately mapped service, filing, counting, statutory exception, neighboring procedure or edition claim |