United States · Delaware Court of Chancery
How is the Chancery response deadline to an amended pleading selected?
Rule 15(a)(6) selects the later of the original response time remaining and 10 days after amended-pleading service. A single service-date input cannot compare both clocks.
- Period
- The preset cannot compare the unexpired original response time with the ten-day amended-pleading branch. No computed or paid date is published.
- Trigger
- Service of the amended pleading and the unexpired original response deadline
- Rule
- Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)
Official rules current as of June 1, 2026, reviewed. The calculator supports this current edition only.
Source guide · No automated date
How is the Chancery response deadline to an amended pleading selected?
The preset cannot compare the unexpired original response time with the ten-day amended-pleading branch. No computed or paid date is published.
Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event starts this Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6) inquiry?
Service of the amended pleading and the unexpired original response deadline
Calculate both applicable branches with their own service and counting qualifications. Select the later unless the Court orders otherwise.
Responsible actor. The party required to respond to the amended pleading. Establish the original response deadline, amended-pleading service and any different court order.
Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)Which comparisons must be resolved before counting?
- Service of the amended pleading and the unexpired original response deadline
- Calculate both applicable branches with their own service and counting qualifications. Select the later unless the Court orders otherwise.
- Identify the actual competing event, court order or statutory condition described here before applying Rule 6. No single date is computed.
- Preserve both response clocks and serve and file the required response by the controlling later boundary.
The source guide explains the actual missing comparisons or procedural conditions. No computed or paid date is supplied.
Rule 6(c) adds three calendar days after the ordinary Rule 6(a) period only for an act measured after service made exclusively by mail. It applies to party acts, not Court acts. Electronic service, an entry-based clock and a filing-based clock do not acquire that addition merely because a paper copy is mailed. These calculations show the disclosed nonexclusive-mail base component; they do not implement the mail-only addition or infer service effectiveness.
These reviewed calculators use the official edition current as of June 1, 2026. Events before that date and backward periods crossing before that date receive no computed or paid date. This is publication coverage, not a finding that an actual procedural act is late. Historical editions, emergency measures, court-modified dates and actual additional closures require separate review.
Ct. Ch. R. 6(a)–(c)What distinguishes these procedural branches?
Assume one amended pleading leaves a later original response deadline, while another arrives after that original period has ended. The same ten-day component cannot select both controlling dates.
The preset cannot compare the unexpired original response time with the ten-day amended-pleading branch. No computed or paid date is published.
Which qualifications change this procedure?
- Later comparison
- The ten-day branch cannot displace a later original response deadline.
- Mail-only service
- Rule 6(c) can affect a period measured after service made exclusively by mail. Review each clock separately.
- Mail-only service and actual court schedule
- Rule 6(c) adds three calendar days after the ordinary Rule 6(a) period only for an act measured after service made exclusively by mail. It applies to party acts, not Court acts. Electronic service, an entry-based clock and a filing-based clock do not acquire that addition merely because a paper copy is mailed. These calculations show the disclosed nonexclusive-mail base component; they do not implement the mail-only addition or infer service effectiveness.
- Current edition and historical scope
- These reviewed calculators use the official edition current as of June 1, 2026. Events before that date and backward periods crossing before that date receive no computed or paid date. This is publication coverage, not a finding that an actual procedural act is late. Historical editions, emergency measures, court-modified dates and actual additional closures require separate review.
- Establish the original response deadline, amended-pleading service and any different court order.
- The preset cannot compare the unexpired original response time with the ten-day amended-pleading branch. No computed or paid date is published.
Which completed acts and evidence should be preserved?
Questions about Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)
How is the Chancery response deadline to an amended pleading selected?
Is ten days always the deadline?
No. A later unexpired original response deadline controls the comparison.
Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)Does the Court have to use that comparison?
No. Rule 15(a)(6) expressly preserves a different court order.
Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6)Is a supplemental pleading governed by this later-of test?
No. The supplemental-pleading response has its separate Rule 15(d) branch.
Ct. Ch. R. 15(d)Official Chancery sources and edition review
Provisions used (12)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6) | The particular actor, event, procedural act and rule conditions |
| Ct. Ch. R. 15(a)(6) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Ct. Ch. R. 6(c) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Ct. Ch. R. 15(d) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Ct. Ch. R. 6(a)–(c) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Ct. Ch. R. 5(b)–(f) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| 1 Del. C. § 501(a)–(c) | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Court of Chancery rule editions and amendments | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| May 18, 2026 implementing order, effective June 1, 2026 | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| July 12, 2024 corrected implementing order | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| September 23, 2025 Magistrate amendments, effective September 30, 2025 | The separately identified counting, filing, procedural qualification or edition source |
| Register in Chancery filing practices, July 26, 2023 | Older filing practices, read subject to the current Rule 5 text |