United States · Texas eviction cases
When does Texas eviction summary disposition require a trial setting?
If the court finds genuinely disputed facts and no trial setting is pending, Rule 510.10(a)(4) requires a trial date at least ten and within twenty-one days after petition filing. The court may immediately set trial on the defendant’s trial request in a summary-disposition response. The actual setting and applicable service requirements still control attendance.
- Period
- Conditional ten-to-twenty-one-day filing window, with the stated immediate-setting request branch
- Trigger
- Actual disputed-facts determination, petition filing, existing setting and any defendant request
- Rule
- Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4), 510.15
Official consolidated rules dated October 1, 2026, with individual amendment and transition provisions
Source guide · No automated date
Check the actual eviction procedure
The conditional range and actual court setting cannot be represented by the isolated ten-day preset.
Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4), 510.15What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event starts this eviction procedure?
Actual disputed-facts determination, petition filing, existing setting and any defendant request
Identify the actual petition filing date and paragraph (a) suit type.
Check whether a trial setting is already pending.
Read the disputed-facts determination, defendant request and actual trial notice.
Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4), 510.15How are days counted in an eviction case?
- Conditional ten-to-twenty-one-day filing window, with the stated immediate-setting request branch
- Court scheduling window from petition filing, not ten days from the disputed-facts ruling
- Identify actual court closure and the required act before applying a period.
Rule 510.4 excludes the event day and counts every intermediate day, including weekends and state or federal holidays. A final weekend or state or federal holiday moves to the next eligible day. If the last filing day falls when the court is closed for all or part of that day, filing moves to the court’s next business day. Check actual closure separately. Express business-day periods and backward minimum notice require their own assessment. The general Rule 4 short-period exclusion does not apply.
Rule 510.5(c) separately requires service of noncitation papers on all other parties and a signed written certificate stating manner and date. Email uses an address expressly provided by the receiving party; after 5:00 p.m. recipient local time it is deemed served the following day. This text does not state the ordinary Rule 501.4 written-consent requirement. Mail-only service adds three days to a document-response period, not automatically to every signing or filing period. Party-requested court proceedings ordinarily require all-party notice at least three days before the proceeding. Citation and petition service instead follows Rule 510.8.
Texas Rule 510.4–.5How do the conditions change the procedure?
Fictitious facts. The court finds a disputed fact while a trial setting already exists. A fresh ten-day addition from that finding does not identify a new trial day.
The conditional range and actual court setting cannot be represented by the isolated ten-day preset.
What conditions must be checked?
- Existing setting
- The paragraph (a)(4) scheduling duty requires genuinely disputed facts and no pending trial setting. It does not silently reset an existing trial date.
- Separate service
- The court’s actual setting must be assessed with Rule 510.15(b)’s service interval. An immediate setting request is not proof that citation service or attendance notice was sufficient.
- Actual lawsuit edition
- The amended order, Misc. Docket No. 25-9105, paragraphs 4 and 6, makes the amendments effective January 1, 2026 and applies rewritten Rule 510 only to eviction lawsuits filed on or after that date. Earlier lawsuits use the earlier rules even when a hearing, judgment or appeal occurs later. The order is titled preliminary approval but expressly establishes effectiveness. Check later amendments and the actual lawsuit filing date. The October 1 consolidation date is not this transition date.
- Eviction has a standalone procedure
- Rule 510 governs the eviction lawsuit under Property Code Chapter 24. It does not govern pre-lawsuit notices to pay rent or vacate or notices to vacate. Rule 510.1(b) excludes other Civil and Evidence Rules unless specifically provided by law or these rules and prohibits a justice court from modifying or suspending Rule 510. The ordinary Rules 500–507 fairness and extension provisions are not an independent eviction extension power.
- A court scheduling range and conditional request are different from a single filing deadline for a party.
- The conditional range and actual court setting cannot be represented by the isolated ten-day preset.
What must be filed, served and preserved?
Common questions about this eviction procedure
When does Texas eviction summary disposition require a trial setting?
Do ten days start from the disputed-facts ruling?
No. Paragraph (a)(4) states the petition-filing anchor for the ordinary window.
Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4)Must the court replace an already pending setting?
The stated scheduling duty applies when no trial setting is pending.
Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4)Who may request immediate trial in this branch?
The rule identifies the defendant’s request for trial in response to summary disposition.
Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4)Official sources and review
Provisions used (6)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4), 510.15 | The actual actor, event and required acts |
| Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4) | Existing setting |
| Texas Rule 510.10(a)(4), 510.15(a)–(b) | Separate service |
| Texas Rule 510.4 | Every-day counting, final holidays and court closure |
| Texas Rule 510.5 | Written filing, permitted methods and separate effective service |
| Misc. Docket No. 25-9105, paragraphs 4 and 6 | Effective date and lawsuit-filing transition |