Unified Patent Court procedure guides
When is the deadline for rejoinder to the reply in damages determination proceedings?
Unsuccessful party uses 1 month to lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply, measured against service of that Reply. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The ordinary source period remains a conditional fixed boundary, not a variable period merely because this page withholds a calculation. This guide supplies no calculated final date.
- Period
- 1 months. Optional rejoinder.
- Trigger
- service of that Reply
- Rule
- UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139
Current UPC maintained legal index and amended Rules effective January 1, 2026, with February 2026 corrigendum retained. Agreement provisions are cross-checked against official original and maintained EPO representations. No complete worldwide amendment search or actual application acceptance is claimed.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
This UPC Rejoinder on damages guide preserves the 1-months source period and its optional step nature. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The actual event, applicable branch, court location and complete final-day conditions require confirmation. It supplies no computed date or paid calculation.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When is the deadline for rejoinder to the reply in damages determination proceedings?
Unsuccessful party uses 1 month to lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply, measured against service of that Reply. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The ordinary source period remains a conditional fixed boundary, not a variable period merely because this page withholds a calculation. This guide supplies no calculated final date.
Responsible actor. unsuccessful party. optional rejoinder.
service of that Reply
The damages Reply has been served
The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply.
This UPC Rejoinder on damages guide preserves the 1-months source period and its optional step nature. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The actual event, applicable branch, court location and complete final-day conditions require confirmation. It supplies no computed date or paid calculation.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139How does this provision count time?
- lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply
- service of that Reply
- For a procedural step, Rule 300 excludes the event day and uses calendar days, named-week anniversary or calendar-month/year anniversary with missing-day clamping. Judicial vacations do not suspend the period.
- Rule 301 extends a procedural expiry falling on a weekend or official holiday of the court location to its next working day. Electronic non-receipt is a separate material branch.
For a procedural step, Rule 300 excludes the event day and uses calendar days, named-week anniversary or calendar-month/year anniversary with missing-day clamping. Judicial vacations do not suspend the period.
Rule 301 extends a procedural expiry falling on a weekend or official holiday of the court location to its next working day. Electronic non-receipt is a separate material branch.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139Which facts prevent one automatic date?
This UPC Rejoinder on damages guide preserves the 1-months source period and its optional step nature. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The actual event, applicable branch, court location and complete final-day conditions require confirmation. It supplies no computed date or paid calculation.
The identified actor has the document or event described by this source provision. service of that Reply must be established. The damages Reply has been served. No final date is supplied without the applicable court location and complete facts.
A different order, actual service event or procedural track applies. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. Check that branch separately. Do not reuse another procedure's event or period.
A nominal period falls on a closed day or depends on another actual event. Rule 301 extends a procedural expiry falling on a weekend or official holiday of the court location to its next working day. Electronic non-receipt is a separate material branch. Preserve the stated source period. This guide does not infer a final case date.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual operative event
- service of that Reply
- Applicable procedural branch
- The damages Reply has been served The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply.
- Host-state calendar and complete act
- Rule 301 extends a procedural expiry falling on a weekend or official holiday of the court location to its next working day. Electronic non-receipt is a separate material branch.
- This UPC Rejoinder on damages guide preserves the 1-months source period and its optional step nature. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. The actual event, applicable branch, court location and complete final-day conditions require confirmation. It supplies no computed date or paid calculation.
- Successful party seeking quantified damages must distinguish lodge an Application for the determination of damages under Rule 126, measured against service of the final merits decision on both infringement and validity, or the date of the qualifying award order. Its stated period is 1 years and its branch is required if seeking determination. That event does not replace service of that Reply for lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply. Unsuccessful party accepting the damages claim must distinguish inform the Registry of acceptance under Rule 137.1, measured against the established service event for the damages Application. Its stated period is 2 months and its branch is required conditional notification. That event does not replace service of that Reply for lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply. Unsuccessful party contesting damages must distinguish lodge a Defence to the damages Application under Rule 137.2, measured against service of the Application, or service of the Rule 131.2 indication after laying open books. Its stated period is 2 months and its branch is required conditional defence. That event does not replace service of that Reply for lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When is the deadline for rejoinder to the reply in damages determination proceedings?
Who acts on rejoinder to the reply in damages determination proceedings?
Unsuccessful party is the relevant actor. The act is to lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply. This branch is optional rejoinder.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139Which event starts the 1 month period?
The relevant event is service of that Reply. The actual event must be established. A catalogue label or estimated event is insufficient.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139What does Rule 139 require here?
The primary provision identifies 1 month and the act to lodge a Rejoinder to the damages Reply. The damages Reply has been served.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139How do weekends and holidays affect this UPC branch?
For a procedural step, Rule 300 excludes the event day and uses calendar days, named-week anniversary or calendar-month/year anniversary with missing-day clamping. Judicial vacations do not suspend the period. Rule 301 extends a procedural expiry falling on a weekend or official holiday of the court location to its next working day. Electronic non-receipt is a separate material branch.
UPC Rules of Procedure, Rules 300 and 301What changes this damages rejoinder branch?
The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply. An actual order, party agreement or different procedural track requires a separate check.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139Which facts must be checked for rejoinder on damages?
Check the damages reply has been served. Confirm service of that Reply. Check the actual court location, applicable order and any permitted variation. The Rejoinder is limited to matters raised in the Reply.
UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139Official sources and review
Provisions used (2)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| UPC Rules of Procedure, amended text effective January 1, 2026, Rule 139 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| UPC Rules of Procedure, Rules 300 and 301 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |