Skip to main content

England and Wales · Arbitration and court procedure

What period and facts govern arbitral review notification date in England and Wales?

The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies
Trigger
The date that party was notified of the result of the arbitral process
Rule
Arbitration Act 1996 section 70
Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

This arbitral review notification date guide uses retained current official Arbitration Act 1996 text and current Justice UK CPR and PD 62 pages. The 2025 Act section 12 and SI 2025/905 commenced the amended section 70 scheme on August 1, 2025. Section 17(4) of the 2025 Act preserves its specified precommencement exclusions; the actual arbitral and court commencement facts remain necessary.

Source guide · No automated date

Check the applicable procedure

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. Establish the actual actor, event, agreed regime, court order and completion facts before relying on a final endpoint. This source guide provides no computed or paid date.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

What period and facts govern arbitral review notification date in England and Wales?

The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

Responsible actor. The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review.

The date that party was notified of the result of the arbitral process

The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

How does this provision count time?

  1. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies
  2. Issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process.
  3. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

For arbitral review notification date, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less.

For arbitral review notification date, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

Which facts prevent one automatic date?

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. Establish the actual actor, event, agreed regime, court order and completion facts before relying on a final endpoint. This source guide provides no computed or paid date.

ResultRead the operative provision and establish the applicable branch.

The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review has records establishing the date that party was notified of the result of the arbitral process. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. Issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. Establish all source facts before choosing a final date.

The proposed compliance period for arbitral review notification date meets a weekend, holiday or court-office closure. For arbitral review notification date, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less. For arbitral review notification date, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. Apply the actual counting regime to the particular act. Do not infer a uniform next-working-day extension.

The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The actual branch facts are not established by the raw catalog period. Issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process. Establish the material facts or follow the actual order; this guide supplies no automatic date.

Which conditions and exceptions apply?

Actual actor and completed procedural act
The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review. Issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process.
Controlling event and applicable agreement or order
The date that party was notified of the result of the arbitral process. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.
Source-specific counting and completion place
For arbitral review notification date, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less. For arbitral review notification date, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.
Arbitration Act 1996 section 70
  • The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review. The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.
  • Arbitral review notification date concerns the applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review and issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history. Arbitration award challenge clock addresses a separate procedural question and cannot establish this actor’s completed step.

What must the responsible actor complete?

Questions about this procedure

What period and facts govern arbitral review notification date in England and Wales?

What period applies to arbitral review notification date?

The section 70 court 28-day period uses this notification event where subsection (3A)(a) applies. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

Which actual event controls arbitral review notification date?

The date that party was notified of the result of the arbitral process. The applicant or appellant after an arbitral appeal or review must establish that event from the actual request, award, service or court records.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

What act completes arbitral review notification date?

Issue the appropriate section 67, 68 or 69 court process. The reviewing body’s decision date and the actual notification date can differ; establish the available process and complete outcome history.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

Is the reviewing body’s decision date enough?

No. Section 70(3A)(a) uses when the applicant or appellant was notified of the result. Keep evidence identifying actual notification.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

Must available arbitral review first be exhausted?

Yes. Section 70(2)(a) makes exhaustion of an available arbitral appeal or review a prerequisite to the court application or appeal.

Arbitration Act 1996 section 70

Does this notification limb remove the need to check the 2025 transition?

No. Although older wording also addressed arbitral review notification, identify the governing edition rather than treating every current statutory limb as retrospective.

Arbitration Act 2025 section 17

Official sources and review

Provisions used (5)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
Arbitration Act 1996 section 70Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Arbitration Act 1996 section 80Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Arbitration Act 2025 section 17Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
CPR 2.8Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
SI 2025/905 regulation 2Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification
Read the official controlling provision

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.