England and Wales · Arbitration and court procedure
What period and facts govern applicant permission-appeal reply in England and Wales?
Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
- Period
- Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary
- Trigger
- Service of the respondent’s notice
- Rule
- PD 62 paragraph 12.9
This applicant permission-appeal reply guide uses the retained current Justice UK PD 62 paragraph 12.9 text. Actual case orders and specialist-court directions must be checked. Where the underlying claim challenges an award, establish the 2025 Act transition and the source-supported section 70 applicable date separately.
Source guide · No automated date
Check the applicable procedure
PD 62 paragraph 12.9. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Establish the actual actor, event, agreed regime, court order and completion facts before relying on a final endpoint. This source guide provides no computed or paid date.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
What period and facts govern applicant permission-appeal reply in England and Wales?
Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
Responsible actor. An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission.
Service of the respondent’s notice
This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9How does this provision count time?
- Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary
- File and serve the brief necessary reply.
- This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
For applicant permission-appeal reply, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less.
For applicant permission-appeal reply, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9Which facts prevent one automatic date?
PD 62 paragraph 12.9. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Establish the actual actor, event, agreed regime, court order and completion facts before relying on a final endpoint. This source guide provides no computed or paid date.
An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission has records establishing service of the respondent’s notice. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. File and serve the brief necessary reply. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Establish all source facts before choosing a final date.
The proposed compliance period for applicant permission-appeal reply meets a weekend, holiday or court-office closure. For applicant permission-appeal reply, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less. For applicant permission-appeal reply, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Apply the actual counting regime to the particular act. Do not infer a uniform next-working-day extension.
This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. The actual branch facts are not established by the raw catalog period. File and serve the brief necessary reply. Establish the material facts or follow the actual order; this guide supplies no automatic date.
Which conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual actor and completed procedural act
- An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission. File and serve the brief necessary reply.
- Controlling event and applicable agreement or order
- Service of the respondent’s notice. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
- Source-specific counting and completion place
- For applicant permission-appeal reply, section 80(4) and (5) separates court issue from service and applies court counting rules to statutory court time limits. CPR 2.8 computes day periods as clear days and omits specified nonworking days only for periods of five days or less. For applicant permission-appeal reply, CPR 2.8(5) addresses an act at a court office whose final day is a closure day. It does not automatically move service on another party, erase required intervening clear days, or lift the enforcement restriction. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
- An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission. Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
- Applicant permission-appeal reply concerns an applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission and file and serve the brief necessary reply. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits. Respondent permission-appeal notice addresses a separate procedural question and cannot establish this actor’s completed step.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
What period and facts govern applicant permission-appeal reply in England and Wales?
What period applies to applicant permission-appeal reply?
Within 7 days after service if reply evidence or argument is necessary. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9Which actual event controls applicant permission-appeal reply?
Service of the respondent’s notice. An applicant filing necessary reply evidence or argument on permission must establish that event from the actual request, award, service or court records.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9What act completes applicant permission-appeal reply?
File and serve the brief necessary reply. This is a conditional right to reply, not an unconditional duty; permission evidence and arbitration documents remain subject to the practice-direction limits.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9Must an applicant always file a reply?
No. Paragraph 12.9 permits evidence or argument in reply only if necessary and requires it to be as brief as possible.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9Does filing the respondent’s notice without service start this clock?
The paragraph uses service of the respondent’s notice. Its filing event alone does not establish the actual source anchor.
PD 62 paragraph 12.9Can a reply introduce any arbitration document without explanation?
Paragraph 12.10 requires the responsible lawyer to explain why additional arbitration documents beyond paragraph 12.5 are necessary.
PD 62 paragraph 12.10Official sources and review
Provisions used (5)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| PD 62 paragraph 12.9 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| PD 62 paragraph 12.4 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| PD 62 paragraph 12.5 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| PD 62 paragraph 12.10 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 2.8 | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |