England and Wales · Civil enforcement
When does issuing a writ or warrant require six-year permission?
CPR 83.2(3)(a) requires court permission to issue a relevant writ or warrant when six years or more have elapsed since the judgment or order.
- Period
- Permission required once six years or more have elapsed
- Trigger
- Date of the judgment or order relied on for issue
- Rule
- CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a), (4)(c)
Official Justice UK CPR text and legislation.gov.uk statutory XML retained on October 9, 2026. The retained source metadata and acquisition receipts identify each edition. No claim of later amendments or actual local court opening is made.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When does issuing a writ or warrant require six-year permission?
CPR 83.2(3)(a) requires court permission to issue a relevant writ or warrant when six years or more have elapsed since the judgment or order.
Responsible actor. The creditor applying to issue a relevant writ or warrant.
Date of the judgment or order relied on for issue.
The result identifies the permission threshold. It is not a last permitted enforcement date and does not say permission will be granted. Check the instrument against CPR 83.2(1).
The result identifies the permission threshold. It is not a last permitted enforcement date and does not say permission will be granted. Check the instrument against CPR 83.2(1).
CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a), (4)(c)How does this provision count time?
- Measure six calendar years from the judgment or order. Label the corresponding point as permission required from that threshold, rather than presenting it as a final day for unpermitted issue.
- A closed court office cannot safely be treated as delaying when six years have elapsed. An actual permission application and the resulting order remain separate events.
Measure six calendar years from the judgment or order. Label the corresponding point as permission required from that threshold, rather than presenting it as a final day for unpermitted issue.
A closed court office cannot safely be treated as delaying when six years have elapsed. An actual permission application and the resulting order remain separate events.
CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a), (4)(c)What do independently checked examples show?
Fictitious example
The creditor applying to issue a relevant writ or warrant. The established event is Friday, October 9, 2026. Use 72 calendar months, excluding the event date and reaching the corresponding calendar boundary. The endpoint is Saturday, October 9, 2032. It identifies the stated boundary rather than a guaranteed successful filing or permission grant. Additional fictitious established facts. Fictitious individually specified facts. The listed context makes the actual branch, actors, event history and completion facts explicit. Additional dates below are stated hypothetical facts rather than inferred client records.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example 1. Ordinary established facts | The creditor applying to issue a relevant writ or warrant. The established event is Friday, October 9, 2026. Use 72 calendar months, excluding the event date and reaching the corresponding calendar boundary. The endpoint is Saturday, October 9, 2032. It identifies the stated boundary rather than a guaranteed successful filing or permission grant. Additional fictitious established facts. Fictitious individually specified facts. The listed context makes the actual branch, actors, event history and completion facts explicit. Additional dates below are stated hypothetical facts rather than inferred client records. The established event is Friday, October 9, 2026. Use 72 calendar months, excluding the event date and reaching the corresponding calendar boundary. The endpoint is Saturday, October 9, 2032. It identifies the stated boundary rather than a guaranteed successful filing or permission grant. | Saturday, October 9, 2032 |
| Example 2. Closed-day boundary | The creditor applying to issue a relevant writ or warrant. The corresponding source boundary is Saturday, October 9, 2032. This fixture concerns the statutory boundary, permission threshold or instrument validity itself. A closed court office does not automatically change that boundary; it does not purport to authorize a separate court act on a closed day. Additional fictitious established facts. Fictitious individually specified facts. The listed context makes the actual branch, actors, event history and completion facts explicit. Additional dates below are stated hypothetical facts rather than inferred client records. The corresponding source boundary is Saturday, October 9, 2032. This fixture concerns the statutory boundary, permission threshold or instrument validity itself. A closed court office does not automatically change that boundary; it does not purport to authorize a separate court act on a closed day. | Saturday, October 9, 2032 |
| Example 3. Material procedural branch | The creditor applying to issue a relevant writ or warrant. The parties entitled to enforce have changed before six years. The separate permission ground requires legal review. Additional fictitious established facts. Fictitious individually specified facts. The listed context makes the actual branch, actors, event history and completion facts explicit. Additional dates below are stated hypothetical facts rather than inferred client records. The parties entitled to enforce have changed before six years. The separate permission ground requires legal review. | The separate permission ground requires legal review. |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions and exceptions apply?
- Identified actor and operative event
- The result identifies the permission threshold. It is not a last permitted enforcement date and does not say permission will be granted. Check the instrument against CPR 83.2(1).
- Provision-specific counting and closure
- Measure six calendar years from the judgment or order. Label the corresponding point as permission required from that threshold, rather than presenting it as a final day for unpermitted issue. A closed court office cannot safely be treated as delaying when six years have elapsed. An actual permission application and the resulting order remain separate events.
- Required completion and separate procedural route
- CPR 83.2(4) prescribes supporting information, including reasons for delay for the six-year case. Other permission conditions in rule 83.2(3) may apply earlier.
- The result identifies the permission threshold. It is not a last permitted enforcement date and does not say permission will be granted. Check the instrument against CPR 83.2(1).
- Section 24(1) limits a fresh action upon a judgment. CPR 83.2(3)(a) instead regulates issue of an enforcement instrument on the existing judgment or order.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When does issuing a writ or warrant require six-year permission?
Which instruments fall within the six-year permission rule?
CPR 83.2(1) includes writs and warrants of control, writs of execution, warrants of delivery and warrants of possession. Check the actual proposed instrument.
CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a)Is enforcement automatically prohibited forever after six years?
No. Rule 83.2 requires permission to issue the instrument. The applicant must obtain that permission rather than treating the threshold as automatic extinction of the judgment.
CPR 83.2(3)(a)What explanation accompanies a six-year permission application?
Rule 83.2(4)(c) requires reasons for the delay in enforcing the judgment or order. The other required application information remains applicable.
CPR 83.2(4)(a)–(f)Must the six-year permission application always be served on the debtor?
Rule 83.2(5) permits an application without notice unless the court directs otherwise. Preserve any actual direction requiring notice.
CPR 83.2(5)Can permission be required before the six-year threshold?
Yes. Other limbs address matters such as changes in parties and specified conditions. Six years is not the only reason permission may be necessary.
CPR 83.2(3)(b)–(f)Does permission already obtained last indefinitely?
No. Rule 83.2(7A) makes the permission order cease if the relevant writ is not issued within one year after that order. Rule 83.2(7B) permits fresh permission.
CPR 83.2(7A)–(7B)Official sources and review
Provisions used (8)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a), (4)(c) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 2.8(2)–(5) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(1), (3)(a) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(3)(a) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(4)(a)–(f) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(5) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(3)(b)–(f) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CPR 83.2(7A)–(7B) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |