England and Wales · Extradition procedures
When must the High Court receive a Part 1 Supreme Court leave application?
Section 32(5) permits fourteen days starting with the High Court’s decision on the section 26 or 28 appeal. CrimPR 50.25 permits an immediate oral application or a written application served on the High Court officer and every other party.
- Period
- Ordinary 14 days
- Trigger
- Actual High Court decision on the Part 1 appeal
- Rule
- Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)
The sources for part 1 supreme court leave from high court deadline were checked. A High Court merits decision starts this period. A later refusal of leave starts the separate application period for the Supreme Court.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must the High Court receive a Part 1 Supreme Court leave application?
Section 32(5) permits fourteen days starting with the High Court’s decision on the section 26 or 28 appeal. CrimPR 50.25 permits an immediate oral application or a written application served on the High Court officer and every other party.
Responsible actor. A party seeking High Court leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court.
Actual High Court decision on the Part 1 appeal
The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements.
The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. The reviewed calendar for part 1 supreme court leave from high court deadline covers established events and final dates in 2026 and 2027.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)How does this provision count time?
- Include the established statutory event day as day one. Count the specified calendar days to the inclusive endpoint. A High Court merits decision starts this period. A later refusal of leave starts the separate application period for the Supreme Court.
- For the written branch, complete service on the High Court officer and every other party. Identify the proposed certified point and give the required reasons.
Include the established statutory event day as day one. Count the specified calendar days to the inclusive endpoint. A High Court merits decision starts this period. A later refusal of leave starts the separate application period for the Supreme Court.
Only an established ordinary business-day endpoint is supported for part 1 supreme court leave from high court deadline. A weekend or public-holiday endpoint requires separate review of the applicable statutory procedure. For the written branch, complete service on the High Court officer and every other party. Identify the proposed certified point and give the required reasons.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)What do independently checked examples show?
Fictitious example
The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Friday, October 9, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Ordinary autumn weekday example.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example 1. Ordinary established facts | The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Friday, October 9, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Ordinary autumn weekday example. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. | Thursday, October 22, 2026 |
| Example 2. Closed-day boundary | The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Tuesday, February 9, 2027. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Different source-covered year; Easter exclusions apply to business-day counting. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. This example crosses intermediate nonbusiness days. Statutory calendar periods include them; the two respondent business-day periods exclude them. No unsupported final-day extension is inferred. | Monday, February 22, 2027 |
| Example 3. Material procedural branch | The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Wednesday, December 23, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Internal Christmas or New Year holidays test the applicable calendar and year boundary. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. | Tuesday, January 5, 2027 |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual procedure and actor
- The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements.
- Required completion
- For the written branch, complete service on the High Court officer and every other party. Identify the proposed certified point and give the required reasons.
- Distinct neighboring branch
- A High Court merits decision starts this period. A later refusal of leave starts the separate application period for the Supreme Court.
- The High Court decides a qualifying Part 1 appeal under section 26 or 28. The selected branch is a written application to the High Court for Supreme Court leave. Certification and all required service remain separate requirements. The reviewed calendar for part 1 supreme court leave from high court deadline covers established events and final dates in 2026 and 2027.
- A High Court merits decision starts this period. A later refusal of leave starts the separate application period for the Supreme Court.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must the High Court receive a Part 1 Supreme Court leave application?
Does the High Court merits decision day count?
Yes. Section 32(5) includes that decision day in the fourteen-day permitted period.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)May the party apply orally for Supreme Court leave?
CrimPR 50.25(2)(a) allows an oral application immediately after the High Court decision. A later written application uses the service branch.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)Who receives the written High Court leave application?
CrimPR 50.25(2)(b) requires service on the High Court officer and every other party. One recipient alone does not satisfy that requirement.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)Does a point of general public importance need certification?
Section 32(4) requires High Court certification and the granting court’s assessment that the point ought to be considered by the Supreme Court.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)Can ordinary case management extend this statutory permission period?
The note to CrimPR 50.25 states that the statutory permission limit may be neither shortened nor extended. Do not assume a general extension.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)What additional applications may a defendant need to include?
CrimPR 50.25(4) addresses applications for bail pending appeal and permission to attend a Supreme Court hearing when the defendant is in custody.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5)Official sources and review
Provisions used (4)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Extradition Act 2003 section 32(5) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CrimPR 2.2, definition of business day | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CrimPR 4.11, actual and deemed service | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Current Criminal Procedure Rules official collection | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |