England and Wales · Extradition procedures
When must a Part 1 party apply to the Supreme Court after leave is refused?
Section 32(6) permits fourteen days starting with the day the High Court refuses leave. That refusal date differs from the earlier merits decision. The Supreme Court application and any certification requirement must be completed through the applicable Registry procedure.
- Period
- Ordinary 14 days
- Trigger
- Actual High Court refusal of Part 1 Supreme Court leave
- Rule
- Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)
The sources for part 1 supreme court leave after refusal deadline were checked. The Supreme Court refusal-following application period follows High Court refusal of leave. It is not a fresh fourteen days after receiving an informal copy.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
When must a Part 1 party apply to the Supreme Court after leave is refused?
Section 32(6) permits fourteen days starting with the day the High Court refuses leave. That refusal date differs from the earlier merits decision. The Supreme Court application and any certification requirement must be completed through the applicable Registry procedure.
Responsible actor. The party applying to the Supreme Court after High Court refusal of leave.
Actual High Court refusal of Part 1 Supreme Court leave
The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence.
The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. The reviewed calendar for part 1 supreme court leave after refusal deadline covers established events and final dates in 2026 and 2027.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)How does this provision count time?
- Include the established statutory event day as day one. Count the specified calendar days to the inclusive endpoint. The Supreme Court refusal-following application period follows High Court refusal of leave. It is not a fresh fourteen days after receiving an informal copy.
- Verify the actual High Court refusal order and complete the Supreme Court application under its applicable filing requirements. Preserve the refusal and filing evidence.
Include the established statutory event day as day one. Count the specified calendar days to the inclusive endpoint. The Supreme Court refusal-following application period follows High Court refusal of leave. It is not a fresh fourteen days after receiving an informal copy.
The Supreme Court Registry must be open on the supported final day. The model excludes Christmas vacation, other Registry closures and portal-maintenance branches until their actual treatment is established. Verify the actual High Court refusal order and complete the Supreme Court application under its applicable filing requirements. Preserve the refusal and filing evidence.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)What do independently checked examples show?
Fictitious example
The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Friday, October 9, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Ordinary autumn weekday example.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example 1. Ordinary established facts | The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Friday, October 9, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Ordinary autumn weekday example. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. | Thursday, October 22, 2026 |
| Example 2. Closed-day boundary | The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Tuesday, February 9, 2027. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Different source-covered year; Easter exclusions apply to business-day counting. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. This example crosses intermediate nonbusiness days. Statutory calendar periods include them; the two respondent business-day periods exclude them. No unsupported final-day extension is inferred. | Monday, February 22, 2027 |
| Example 3. Material procedural branch | The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. Fictitious source-qualified actual event on Wednesday, December 23, 2026. Applicable confirmations are expressly established. No additional closure or order variation. Internal Christmas or New Year holidays test the applicable calendar and year boundary. Independent date enumeration follows the retained statute/rule. The first counted date and actual endpoint are retained; no application result is used as the oracle. | Tuesday, January 5, 2027 |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish eligibility, effective service, relief or a direction.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions and exceptions apply?
- Actual procedure and actor
- The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence.
- Required completion
- Verify the actual High Court refusal order and complete the Supreme Court application under its applicable filing requirements. Preserve the refusal and filing evidence.
- Distinct neighboring branch
- The Supreme Court refusal-following application period follows High Court refusal of leave. It is not a fresh fourteen days after receiving an informal copy.
- The High Court actually refuses leave to appeal its Part 1 decision to the Supreme Court. The refusal event is established, not the earlier merits decision or informal receipt of correspondence. The reviewed calendar for part 1 supreme court leave after refusal deadline covers established events and final dates in 2026 and 2027.
- The Supreme Court refusal-following application period follows High Court refusal of leave. It is not a fresh fourteen days after receiving an informal copy.
What must the responsible actor complete?
Questions about this procedure
When must a Part 1 party apply to the Supreme Court after leave is refused?
What starts the Part 1 application to the Supreme Court?
Section 32(6) uses the day the High Court refuses leave. It does not use the original appeal decision or later informal correspondence.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)Does the refusal day count as the first day?
Yes. The fourteen-day period starts with the refusal day under section 32(6).
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)Does refusal by the High Court remove the certification requirement?
No. Section 32(4) still requires the High Court’s certificate of a point of law of general public importance.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)Is the Supreme Court application the same as bringing the appeal?
No. The application seeks leave. Section 32(7) supplies a distinct twenty-eight-day period after leave is granted.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)Can this page assume a Registry holiday extension?
A Registry closure requires the applicable Supreme Court rules and filing context. An unsupported closed-day branch must not produce a date.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)What happens to finality if no Supreme Court application follows?
Section 36(5)(b) addresses High Court finality when the permitted Supreme Court application period ends without an application.
Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6)Official sources and review
Provisions used (5)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Extradition Act 2003 section 32(6) | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CrimPR 2.2, definition of business day | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| CrimPR 4.11, actual and deemed service | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Current Criminal Procedure Rules official collection | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |
| Supreme Court Practice Directions 2 and 12 and Portal Practice Direction | Check the identified procedure, event, counting rule or qualification |