United States · Federal appellate procedure
When may another party appeal after a timely Tax Court notice?
If one party files a timely notice of appeal, FRAP 13(a)(1)(A) permits any other party to file within 120 days after the Tax Court decision is entered. The clock runs from decision entry, not from the first party’s notice. Establish the timely-first-notice condition and any Rule 13(a)(1)(B) motion effect separately before using the calculator.
- Period
- 120 calendar days after operative decision entry, conditioned on a timely first notice
- Trigger
- Independently established Tax Court operative decision entry, after confirming another party’s timely notice
- Rule
- FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)
Current court-linked Appellate and Bankruptcy Rules effective December 1, 2025, and Tax Court Rules amended through August 2024, reacquired October 8, 2026.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event and actor control this requirement?
If one party files a timely notice of appeal, FRAP 13(a)(1)(A) permits any other party to file within 120 days after the Tax Court decision is entered. The clock runs from decision entry, not from the first party’s notice. Establish the timely-first-notice condition and any Rule 13(a)(1)(B) motion effect separately before using the calculator.
Responsible actor. Another party appealing after one party has filed a timely Tax Court notice of appeal.
Preserve the Tax Court decision and operative entry evidence.
Confirm that one party actually filed a timely notice; an intended or late notice does not establish this branch.
Use decision entry rather than first-notice filing. Review a timely vacate or revise motion separately.
Use the Rule 13(a)(1)(A) other-party period only after confirming that one party filed a timely notice. This calculator does not establish that condition, decide motion effects, extend time or compute from the first notice date.
FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)Which days and procedural branches must I count?
- Verify one party’s timely notice and this other-party route.
- Establish the operative decision-entry event.
- Exclude that day and count 120 calendar days.
- Check final-day Tax Court holidays, actual filing method and proof.
Exclude the independently established trigger day. Count every following calendar day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Under FRAP 26(a)(1), a final weekend or legal holiday carries forward to the next qualifying day. Actual clerk inaccessibility is a separate Rule 26(a)(3) question.
Rules 13, 14 and 26 and Tax Court Rule 25 require the Tax Court calendar, including DC Emancipation Day on April 16. Check additional presidential, congressional or DC holidays and applicable circuit-state holidays under Rule 26(a)(6)(C). The bundled 2025–2027 calendar does not establish extra declared holidays or actual clerk and DAWSON access.
FRAP 26(a)What do independent deadline examples show?
Fictitious example
The decision was entered June 1 and another party has actually filed a timely first notice. No additional holiday, clerk inaccessibility or contrary controlling order is assumed.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary established event | Exclude June 1, 2026 and enumerate 120 calendar days. Day 120 is Tuesday, September 29, 2026. That date is the assumed qualifying final day. | Tuesday, September 29, 2026 |
| Weekend or holiday final day | Exclude June 5, 2026 and enumerate 120 calendar days. Day 120 is Saturday, October 3, 2026. The final-day sequence excludes 2026-10-03, 2026-10-04. Continue to Monday, October 5, 2026. | Monday, October 5, 2026 |
| Weekend or holiday final day | Exclude December 17, 2025 and enumerate 120 calendar days. Day 120 is Thursday, April 16, 2026. The final-day sequence excludes 2026-04-16. Continue to Friday, April 17, 2026. | Friday, April 17, 2026 |
| Established material condition | Exclude July 1, 2026 and enumerate 120 calendar days. Day 120 is Thursday, October 29, 2026. That date is the assumed qualifying final day. The decision was entered July 1. The first party filed a timely notice August 3. Count from July 1, not August 3. | Thursday, October 29, 2026 |
Fictitious established facts. These examples do not establish appealability, operative entry, valid certification, motion timeliness, effective service or actual filing.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich conditions change this appellate procedure?
- A timely first notice is a condition
- Rule 13(a)(1)(A) permits the 120-day period only if one party files a timely notice. The calculator does not establish that fact or turn a late first notice into timely appellate jurisdiction.
- The first notice does not start 120 days
- Rule 13 expressly measures this period from Tax Court decision entry. This differs from the ordinary district-court Rule 4(a)(3) comparison. Do not transfer that cross-appeal formula here.
- A timely motion changes the starting event
- Under Rule 13(a)(1)(B), a timely motion to vacate or revise under Tax Court rules makes appeal time run from entry of the disposing order or a new decision, whichever is later. A motion concerning findings or opinion is not automatically that motion. Establish timeliness and the actual later event separately.
- Filing method has its own conditions
- Rule 13(a)(2) refers mailed filing to section 7502 and regulations. Rule 13(a)(3) refers notice contents, service and effect to Rule 3. Check current Tax Court filing instructions, complete notice contents and the required copies. This calculator does not decide mailing qualification.
- The court of appeals cannot grant a routine extension
- FRAP 26(b)(1) bars extending notice-of-appeal time except as authorized in Rule 4. Rule 14 excludes Rule 4 from this Tax Court route. Do not infer an extension, reopening or extra three service days from the district-court civil procedure.
- Use the Rule 13(a)(1)(A) other-party period only after confirming that one party filed a timely notice. This calculator does not establish that condition, decide motion effects, extend time or compute from the first notice date.
- The conditional branch supplies one fixed 120-day period from established operative entry. The timely first notice and any Rule 13(a)(1)(B) event must be established independently.
What must I file and verify?
Questions about this appellate requirement
When may another party appeal after a timely Tax Court notice?
Do the 120 days start from the first notice of appeal?
No. Rule 13(a)(1)(A) uses the Tax Court decision’s entry. The first timely notice establishes eligibility for the branch, rather than replacing the starting date.
FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)Is the 120-day period available before anyone appeals timely?
Do not assume it. The rule expressly conditions the other-party period on one party filing a timely notice. Establish that actual condition before using this preset.
FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)Is this the ordinary fourteen-day federal cross-appeal formula?
No. The Tax Court rule states 120 days from decision entry. Rule 14 excludes Rule 4 from this route. The ordinary district-court cross-appeal comparison is a different procedure.
FRAP 14What happens if a timely vacate or revise motion applies?
Rule 13(a)(1)(B) makes appeal time run from disposing-order entry or new-decision entry, whichever is later. Establish timeliness and the operative event rather than counting from the original opinion or first notice.
FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)Must the other party also file with the Tax Court clerk?
Yes. Rule 13(a) governs this notice. Use the Tax Court filing procedure, notice contents and copies, including any independently established qualifying mailing conditions.
FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3)Does a closed final day make the first-notice condition unnecessary?
No. Holiday rollover changes the counting boundary after the branch is established. It does not establish that another party’s first notice was timely.
FRAP 26(a)(1)–(3)Official sources and review
Provisions used (9)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FRAP 13(a)(1)–(3) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| FRAP 14 | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| Tax Court Rule 190(a) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| Tax Court Rule 25(a)(4)–(5) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| Tax Court Rule 22(d) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| FRAP 26(a)(4)–(6), (b) and (c) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| Tax Court Rule 25(a)(1)–(3) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| FRAP 26(a)(1)–(3) | The identified act, trigger, conditions, filing boundary and edition qualification |
| FRAP 26(a) | Exclude the trigger, count calendar days and handle final-day weekends, holidays and inaccessibility |