United States · Federal class-certification appeals
When must I petition for permission to appeal a class-certification order?
FRCP 23(f) ordinarily requires a permission petition with the circuit clerk within fourteen days after entry of an order granting or denying class-action certification. Its forty-five-day federal-party condition is separate. An order under Rule 23(e)(1) is excluded. The court of appeals decides whether to permit the appeal. Permission, federal-party status, reconsideration and actual filing conditions require separate review.
- Period
- Fourteen calendar days after qualifying order entry
- Trigger
- Actual entry of the qualifying order granting or denying class-action certification, without unresolved reconsideration or later-order issues
- Rule
- FRCP 23(f)
December 1, 2025 compilation
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which order entry and party condition start this period?
Identify actual entry of the order granting or denying class-action certification. Do not substitute signature, service or receipt.
The forty-five-day condition applies if any party is the United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer or employee sued for an act or omission connected with duties performed on the United States’ behalf. A government subject matter, government witness or unrelated private conduct alone does not establish that condition.
Rule 23(e)(1) orders are outside this permission procedure. Permission is discretionary and does not itself stay district proceedings.
If reconsideration or a later order may affect the starting event, establish the controlling law and actual facts before using this scoped preset.
FRCP 23(f)How are the fourteen days counted?
- Independently verify the qualifying order and correct federal-party branch.
- Exclude actual order entry.
- Count 14 calendar days, including intermediate weekends and holidays.
- Roll a closed final day and check extra holidays, inaccessibility and the actual circuit filing cutoff.
FRCP 6(a)(1) applies to time specified in the Civil Rules, including Rule 23(f). Exclude actual order entry and count every calendar day. If the final day is Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, continue to the next open day. The petition goes to the circuit clerk under FRAP 5(a)(1). Its appellate filing boundary is separate from the district court’s order-entry event.
FRCP 6(a)(6) includes listed federal holidays, President or Congress declared holidays and, for forward periods, state-declared holidays where the district court is located. Check actual local instructions, additional holidays and clerk inaccessibility. The national preset does not establish these case facts.
The period runs after entry, so service of the order does not automatically add three days. FRAP 26(c) and FRCP 6(d) concern specified service-triggered periods.
FRCP 6(a)(1), (3)–(6)What does this scoped calculation look like?
Fictitious example
A fictitious qualifying certification order is entered July 6. No party meets Rule 23(f)’s federal-party condition. No reconsideration or later order changes the starting event. Exclude July 6. Fourteen calendar days reaches the assumed open July 20.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Actual qualifying order entry | July 6, 2026 |
| Count | 14 calendar days after entry | July 20, 2026 |
| Result | Assumed open final day | July 20, 2026 |
Fictitious facts. No extra state holiday, inaccessible clerk, unresolved reconsideration or later-order issue is assumed.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich qualifications require separate review?
- Federal-party condition
- The forty-five-day condition applies if any party is the United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer or employee sued for an act or omission connected with duties performed on the United States’ behalf. A government subject matter, government witness or unrelated private conduct alone does not establish that condition.
- Excluded order
- Rule 23(f) excludes orders under Rule 23(e)(1). Confirm that the actual order grants or denies class-action certification.
- Permission and stay
- Filing requests discretionary permission. It does not grant the appeal or stay district proceedings. A district or appellate stay order is separate.
- Reconsideration and later orders
- This scoped calculator excludes unresolved reconsideration, revised-order and antecedent-start issues. Nutraceutical’s footnote 7 and remand do not decide every such branch.
- No equitable tolling
- Nutraceutical holds the Rule 23(f) limit nonjurisdictional but unavailable for equitable tolling. The court of appeals cannot extend permission-petition time under FRAP 26(b)(1).
- The calculator does not grant permission, determine appellate jurisdiction or establish the underlying case facts.
- The displayed national count does not resolve additional holidays, local filing instructions, reconsideration or revised-order issues.
What must I prepare and file?
Common questions
Federal parties, permission and timing limits
Does the petitioner have to be the government to receive forty-five days?
The forty-five-day condition applies if any party is the United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer or employee sued for an act or omission connected with duties performed on the United States’ behalf. A government subject matter, government witness or unrelated private conduct alone does not establish that condition. The condition concerns any party, so a qualifying government party can change a private petitioner’s period.
FRCP 23(f)Can I use this for an order directing settlement notice under Rule 23(e)(1)?
No. Rule 23(f) expressly excludes an order under Rule 23(e)(1). Identify the actual order and procedure.
FRCP 23(f)Does filing the petition stay district-court proceedings?
No. Rule 23(f) requires an order from the district judge or court of appeals for that stay.
FRCP 23(f)Can equitable tolling cure a late permission petition?
Nutraceutical rejects equitable tolling of Rule 23(f)’s time limit. FRAP 26(b)(1) bars appellate extension. Its nonjurisdictional character permits waiver or forfeiture, but does not authorize a routine extension.
Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, opinion pp. 3–5Does every reconsideration request restart the petition period?
No automatic restart is calculated. Nutraceutical distinguishes timely reconsideration’s effect on the starting event from equitable tolling, but leaves specific reconsideration and alternative timeliness questions undecided. Establish controlling circuit law and actual orders separately.
Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, opinion pp. 8–10 and n. 7Official sources and scope
Provisions used (10)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FRCP 23(f) | Qualifying orders, party condition, periods and no automatic stay |
| FRCP 6(a)(1) | Civil Rules calendar counting, holidays and inaccessibility |
| FRCP 6(a)(1), (3)–(6) | Civil Rules calendar counting, holidays and inaccessibility |
| FRAP 5(a)(1)–(2) | Circuit petition, content, filing, service and limits |
| FRAP 5(b)–(d) | Circuit petition, content, filing, service and limits |
| FRAP 25(a)–(d) | Circuit petition, content, filing, service and limits |
| FRAP 25(b)–(d) | Circuit petition, content, filing, service and limits |
| FRAP 26(a)(4) and (b)–(c) | Circuit petition, content, filing, service and limits |
| Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, opinion pp. 3–5 | No equitable tolling and nonjurisdictional classification |
| Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, opinion pp. 8–10 and n. 7 | Starting-event distinction and expressly unresolved questions |