United States · Federal statutory limitations
When does the two-year securities fraud discovery component expire?
A covered private securities fraud action must satisfy the earlier of two years after discovery of the violation facts and five years after the violation. This page calculates only the two-year discovery component. Merck includes the point when a reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered the relevant facts, including scienter.
- Period
- Two-year discovery component, subject to the earlier five-year violation component
- Trigger
- Established discovery of the facts constituting the violation
- Rule
- 28 U.S.C. § 1658(b)(1)–(2)
S. Code, laws in effect January 6, 2025. The subsequent-law review covers the retained 119th Congress corpus through Public Law 119-118, approved September 30, 2026. Its scoped candidate findings do not establish every claim-specific exception or later judicial application. This page requires the stated covered cause and legally established event.
Free calculator · No account needed
Calculate your deadline
Loading calculator…
What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event starts this particular limitation?
A covered private securities fraud action must satisfy the earlier of two years after discovery of the violation facts and five years after the violation. This page calculates only the two-year discovery component. Merck includes the point when a reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered the relevant facts, including scienter.
Responsible actor. The plaintiff bringing a covered private securities fraud action.
Identify the covered securities-law private action.
Establish actual or reasonably diligent discovery of the facts constituting the violation.
Record the separate violation event and calculate its five-year component.
Use for the established discovery component of a qualifying private securities fraud claim. Independently determine the violation date and compare the separate repose component.
28 U.S.C. § 1658(b)(1)–(2)How is this established federal civil court component counted?
- Established discovery of the facts constituting the violation
- For the established federal civil court component, FRCP 6(a)(1) excludes the trigger day and includes intermediate weekends and holidays. A period in months or years uses its corresponding calendar date, rather than a fixed number of days. The final weekend or legal holiday moves forward under Rule 6(a). A target month or year without the corresponding day requires separate endpoint review; this calculator refuses that input.
- Bring the qualifying civil action within both applicable components. Preserve the discovery evidence, violation evidence and completed court filing.
Retained 2024 annual U.S. Code, laws in effect January 6, 2025. The subsequent-law review covers the retained 119th Congress corpus through Public Law 119-118, approved September 30, 2026. Its scoped candidate findings do not establish every claim-specific exception or later judicial application. This page requires the stated covered cause and legally established event. Court computation uses the retained December 1, 2025 FRCP compilation; identified agency regulations use their separately stated 2026 API editions.
The calendar covers established events and results from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2033. OPM observations for 2025–2030 are independently checked. Dates in 2031–2033 are standing-rule projections under 5 U.S.C. § 6103, not published OPM schedules. Additional presidential, congressional or district-state holidays, amendments and actual clerk inaccessibility require separate review. Inauguration Day is not treated as a nationwide district-court holiday. The coverage boundary does not establish statutory applicability or lateness.
FRCP 3, 6(a)(1), (3), (4), (6) and 6(d)What do independently derived component examples show?
Fictitious example
Fictitious independently established facts. Use for the established discovery component of a qualifying private securities fraud claim. Independently determine the violation date and compare the separate repose component.
| Step | What is counted | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary established event | Established discovery of the facts constituting the violation | Tuesday, June 2, 2026 |
| Ordinary component | Event on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. The independently established 2-years component has the corresponding nominal date 2028-06-02. Under the stated federal civil court assumptions, the final date is 2028-06-02. No tolling, service addition or unknown local holiday is assumed. | Friday, June 2, 2028 |
| Holiday component | Event on Thursday, January 1, 2026. The independently established 2-years component has the corresponding nominal date 2028-01-01. Under the stated federal civil court assumptions, the final date is 2028-01-03. No tolling, service addition or unknown local holiday is assumed. | Monday, January 3, 2028 |
| Confirmed clerk-inaccessibility branch | Event on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. The independently established 2-years component has the corresponding nominal date 2028-06-02. Under the stated federal civil court assumptions, the final date is 2028-06-05. No tolling, service addition or unknown local holiday is assumed. Fictitious independently confirmed full-day clerk closure on Friday, June 2, 2028; no contrary court order. | Monday, June 5, 2028 |
| Independent statutory comparison | Established discovery on Saturday, June 2, 2029 gives Monday, June 2, 2031. The separate established violation on Thursday, January 2, 2025 gives Wednesday, January 2, 2030. Compare both applicable components. | Earlier component. Wednesday, January 2, 2030 |
| Independent statutory comparison | Established discovery on Tuesday, June 2, 2026 gives Friday, June 2, 2028. The separate established violation on Tuesday, June 2, 2026 gives Monday, June 2, 2031. Compare both applicable components. | Earlier component. Friday, June 2, 2028 |
Fictitious independently established events and classifications. The displayed result is this one untolled component. Securities earlier-of comparisons and alternative wage classifications are separately identified. These examples do not determine accrual, discovery, statutory liability, the actual forum, an exception, a completed filing or an unrecorded closure. Use for the established discovery component of a qualifying private securities fraud claim. Independently determine the violation date and compare the separate repose component.
Try these dates in the calculatorWhich qualifications can change this limitation analysis?
- Earlier component controls
- A later discovery result cannot postpone the separate five-year violation component.
- Discovery is a legal finding
- Suspicion or an investigation date alone does not establish discovery of every required violation fact.
- Instrument and statutory scope
- Establish that the alleged conduct and instrument are within the applicable securities law. The period does not classify an instrument or create a private cause of action.
- Calendar and endpoint coverage
- The calendar covers established events and results from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2033. OPM observations for 2025–2030 are independently checked. Dates in 2031–2033 are standing-rule projections under 5 U.S.C. § 6103, not published OPM schedules. Additional presidential, congressional or district-state holidays, amendments and actual clerk inaccessibility require separate review. Inauguration Day is not treated as a nationwide district-court holiday. The coverage boundary does not establish statutory applicability or lateness.
- Use for the established discovery component of a qualifying private securities fraud claim. Independently determine the violation date and compare the separate repose component.
- The calculation supplies the stated component on established facts. Unmodeled tolling, competing components and claim-specific exceptions require separate controlling review.
What must be completed and preserved?
Questions about this particular statutory limitation
When does the two-year securities fraud discovery component expire?
Is this result the complete filing deadline?
No. Compare it with the separate five-year violation component and use the earlier applicable boundary.
28 U.S.C. § 1658(b)(1)–(2)Separate five-year violation componentDoes mere suspicion start the two years?
Merck requires actual or reasonably diligent discovery of the facts constituting the violation, including scienter. The calculator cannot resolve that evidence.
Merck & Co. v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633, 648–653 (2010)Different Securities Act discovery componentDoes section 1658(b) create a securities claim?
No. The limitation provision presupposes an applicable private right of action; the statutory notes expressly preserve that distinction.
28 U.S.C. § 1658(b)(1)–(2)Different federal catchall provisionOfficial sources and review
Provisions used (7)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28 U.S.C. § 1658(b)(1)–(2) | This statutory actor, event, period and qualifications |
| Merck & Co. v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633, 648–653 (2010) | The separately identified agency procedure, related statutory requirement or primary decision |
| FRCP 3, 6(a)(1), (3), (4), (6) and 6(d) | Federal court commencement, computation and filing boundary |
| 5 U.S.C. § 6103(a)–(b); Executive Order 11582 § 3(a) | Named and observed holidays, with explicit limits on future projections |
| OPM published federal holiday schedules through 2030 | Named and observed holidays, with explicit limits on future projections |
| 15 U.S.C. § 77m, Securities Act § 13 | The separately identified agency procedure, related statutory requirement or primary decision |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a) | This statutory actor, event, period and qualifications |