United States · Federal criminal post-trial procedure
Which event starts a post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal?
Rule 29(c)(1) permits the defendant to move for acquittal or renew the motion within fourteen days after a guilty verdict or jury discharge, whichever is later. Establish both actual events. Rule 29(c)(3) does not require a prior motion before jury submission. This single-date preset does not compare the events and publishes no calculated date.
- Period
- Fourteen days after the later applicable event, with actual Rule 45 relief assessed separately
- Trigger
- The later of guilty verdict and the court’s jury discharge
- Rule
- FRCrP 29(c)(1)–(3)
December 1, 2025 compilation
Source guide · No automated date
Identify the actual procedure and operative events
Rule 29(c)(1) requires a comparison of actual verdict and jury-discharge events. The isolated single-date preset cannot establish that comparison. No computed date or paid record is published here.
FRCrP 29(c)(1)–(3)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which actual event starts this procedure?
Preserve the actual guilty-verdict event and jury discharge. Rule 29(c)(1) uses whichever is later.
Do not substitute written judgment entry or an assumed later date. This guide does not perform the comparison.
Rule 29(c)(3) does not make a prior motion before jury submission a prerequisite to a post-discharge motion. Civil Rule 50(b) is a different procedure.
FRCrP 29(c)(1)–(3)Why must the actual procedure be established first?
- Identify the actual actor, procedure and grounds.
- Establish the operative event or required event comparison.
- Read all applicable conditions. This page calculates no date.
- Check final-day conditions and the required act. Review actual granted relief separately.
Exclude the independently established operative event. Count every following calendar day, including intermediate weekends and legal holidays, under FRCrP 45(a)(1). These Criminal Rules motions use district-court computation rather than substituting an appellate filing rule.
Rule 45(a)(1) carries a final Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday to the next qualifying day. Rule 45(a)(6) includes federal and President or Congress declared holidays. For forward periods, also check holidays declared by the state where the district court is located. Qualifying clerk inaccessibility is separate.
FRCrP 45(a)Why is no automated date published?
Rule 29(c)(1) requires a comparison of actual verdict and jury-discharge events. The isolated single-date preset cannot establish that comparison. No computed date or paid record is published here.
Which conditions require separate review?
- Actual verdict and discharge
- Preserve both applicable events and establish the later event. A selected single input does not perform that comparison.
- No prior-motion prerequisite
- Rule 29(c)(3) does not require an acquittal motion before jury submission as a prerequisite for a post-discharge motion.
- Actual granted enlargement
- Rule 45(b)(1) permits the court to extend time on its own, or for good cause on a party’s motion before expiry. After expiry, the party’s motion requires failure to act because of excusable neglect. A request or agreement is not an actual grant. This preset computes the ordinary period, not granted relief.
- This page does not establish grounds, merits, actual filing or court action.
- A motion’s filing date and its effect on appeal time are separate questions.
What must I verify before relying on this procedure?
Common questions
Post-verdict acquittal motion
Must the defendant have moved before jury submission?
Rule 29(c)(3) expressly states that such a prior motion is not a prerequisite for a motion after jury discharge. Do not import civil Rule 50(b)’s different renewal conditions.
FRCrP 29(c)(3)Does mailed notice of the event add three days?
No. Rule 45(c) concerns specified periods after service. Mailing notice of a verdict, finding or plea does not replace the operative event or automatically add three days.
FRCrP 45(b)–(c)Does an extension request itself change the date?
No. Rule 45(b)(1) supplies conditions for actual court enlargement. A party’s post-expiry request requires failure to act because of excusable neglect. Preserve any actual order and do not assume a grant.
FRCrP 45(b)–(c)Official sources and scope
Provisions used (4)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FRCrP 29(c)(1)–(3) | This procedure, actor, event and conditions |
| FRCrP 45(a) | Applicable calendar computation and final-day conditions |
| FRCrP 45(b)–(c) | Enlargement conditions, Rule 35 exception and separate service addition |
| FRAP 4(b)(3)–(5) | Distinct appeal consequences, listed timely motions and Rule 35 |