United States · Texas civil discovery
When must all other Texas testifying experts be designated?
In a covered non-Family Code suit, all testifying experts outside Rule 195.2(a)’s affirmative-relief branch ordinarily must be designated sixty days before discovery ends, unless the court orders otherwise. Furnish the required Rule 195.5(a) information. The label defendant does not establish this branch. Family Code cases use Rule 195a.2’s separate later-of comparison. This guide calculates no last date.
- Period
- Sixty days before discovery ends unless the court orders otherwise
- Trigger
- The independently established controlling discovery endpoint
- Rule
- Texas Rule 195.2(b)
Official consolidated rules dated October 1, 2026, with individual amendment and transition provisions
Source guide · No automated date
Establish this act’s complete lead-time requirements
The isolated sixty-day preset does not determine the actual role, controlling endpoint, Family Code service comparison or court order. Its backward review setting cannot resolve a closed-day last date. This guide supplies no calculated endpoint.
Texas Rule 195.2(b)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event controls Texas Rule 195.2(b)?
Establish the complete discovery plan, endpoint and designation order.
Check that the expert does not testify for a party seeking affirmative relief under the ninety-day branch.
Prepare the actual required disclosure information and separately establish deposition availability.
Texas Rule 195.2(b)How must this lead time be preserved?
- Establish the complete discovery plan, endpoint and designation order.
- Measure the ordinary sixty-day limb from the discovery endpoint, not trial or the opposing expert’s designation. The court’s actual order may govern a different date. Family Code cases require the separate service comparison under Rule 195a.2.
- Read any signed order and establish the actual required act, recipients and completion method.
- Check closed days without silently shortening the required interval.
These periods exceed five days, so Rule 4’s exclusion of intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays for short periods does not apply. Do not move a latest date forward toward trial, a hearing or discovery closure merely because the nominal date is closed. That can leave less than the required lead time. Check Rule 4, the controlling order and actual court calendar. This source guide applies no automatic backward closed-day adjustment and supplies no computed last date.
Complete actual service under the applicable rule. Rule 21a distinguishes permitted service methods from filing. Electronic service completes on transmission to the serving party’s electronic filing service provider. Fax received after 5 p.m. in the recipient’s time zone is deemed served the next day. The three-day qualifying-mail addition in Rule 21a(c) concerns a prescribed period after service, not an automatic addition to a backward trial or discovery limit. Preserve recipients, method and completion evidence.
Texas Rule 4Why does this guide not calculate a last date?
The isolated sixty-day preset does not determine the actual role, controlling endpoint, Family Code service comparison or court order. Its backward review setting cannot resolve a closed-day last date. This guide supplies no calculated endpoint.
Which branches or orders change this procedure?
- Role rather than caption
- The sixty-day category is all other experts after excluding those testifying for a party seeking affirmative relief. A defendant’s affirmative claim can matter to the actual expert role.
- Required information
- Rule 195.5(a) requires contact information, subject matter, opinions and their basis, with additional listed items for a retained, employed or controlled expert. A designation date does not establish complete disclosure.
- Family Code later-of rule
- Rule 195a.2 ordinarily chooses the later of thirty days after request service and the applicable sixty-day-before-discovery-end limb for this role, unless the court orders otherwise.
- Deposition sequence
- Rule 195.3(b) requires a controlled expert for a party not seeking affirmative relief to be available reasonably promptly after designation and after affirmative-relief experts on the same subject have been deposed.
- This guide does not establish the actual discovery endpoint, hearing or trial setting, service validity, court calendar or terms of an order.
- A timing explanation does not establish discovery compliance or permission to take the requested action.
What completes this particular required act?
Common questions about this procedure
When must all other Texas testifying experts be designated?
Does the sixty-day period start when the other expert is designated?
No. Rule 195.2(b) measures designation from the discovery endpoint, subject to an actual different order.
Texas Rule 195.2(b)Is every defense expert in this branch?
Check whether the expert testifies for a party seeking affirmative relief. The caption label alone does not decide Rule 195.2(a) or (b).
Texas Rule 195.2(a)–(b)Does timely designation decide deposition availability?
No. Rule 195.3(b) separately addresses designation and the same-subject affirmative experts’ completed depositions.
Texas Rule 195.3(b)Official sources and review
Provisions used (8)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Texas Rule 195.2(b) | This particular required act and its lead time |
| Texas Rule 195.2(a)–(b) | Role rather than caption |
| Texas Rule 195.5(a) | Required information |
| Texas Rule 195a.2 | Family Code later-of rule |
| Texas Rule 195.3(b) | Deposition sequence |
| Texas Rule 4 | Computation, short periods and closed-day limits |
| Texas Rule 21a | Actual service and its proof |
| Texas Rule 195.2, 195.5(a), 191.4–191.5 | Complete the required act, not just a calculation |