United States · Federal district-court post-judgment motion
When must I file a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law?
Rule 50(b) permits a renewed motion no later than twenty-eight days after judgment entry. If it addresses a jury issue not decided by a verdict, the event is instead jury discharge. The rule presupposes its specified prior Rule 50(a) motion. This flagged preset publishes no computed date or paid record.
- Period
- Twenty-eight days from the applicable Rule 50(b) event, requiring separate event assessment
- Trigger
- Judgment entry, or jury discharge for a motion addressing a jury issue not decided by a verdict
- Rule
- FRCP 50(b)
December 1, 2025 compilation
Source guide · No automated date
Identify the motion and the actual starting event
Rule 50(b) has alternative judgment-entry and jury-discharge events. This isolated preset remains flagged for verification. No computed date or paid record is published here. The separate reviewed post-judgment calculator explains its selectable motion and trigger conditions.
FRCP 50(b)What lawyers say
5.0“The platform is really easy to use.”
Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California
“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”
MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK
“The most up-to-date service we could find.”
Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore
Which event starts this motion period?
Use this source guide to identify the prior Rule 50(a) motion, actual issues and Rule 50(b) starting event.
Establish the specified prior Rule 50(a) motion and legal questions. Determine whether the issue was decided by a verdict. Rule 50(b) permits an alternative or joint Rule 59 new-trial request, with its own applicable conditions.
Rule 50(b) ordinarily uses judgment entry. For a motion addressing a jury issue not decided by a verdict, it instead uses jury discharge. Preserve the actual prior motion, issues and discharge evidence. A later judgment does not replace that specified event.
FRCP 50(b)Why must the event be assessed first?
- Identify the prior Rule 50(a) motion and issues.
- Determine whether the jury issue was decided by a verdict.
- Establish the applicable judgment-entry or jury-discharge event.
- Review timing and filing independently. This page publishes no date.
Identify the prior Rule 50(a) motion, issues and actual Rule 50(b) event before assessing the twenty-eight-day period. This guide does not select the event or calculate a date.
Rule 6(a)(1) carries a final Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday to the next qualifying day. Rule 6(a)(6) includes federal and President or Congress declared holidays. For this forward period, check additional holidays declared by the state where the district court is located. Qualifying clerk inaccessibility under Rule 6(a)(3) is a separate condition.
FRCP 6(a)(1)Why is no automated date published?
Rule 50(b) has alternative judgment-entry and jury-discharge events. This isolated preset remains flagged for verification. No computed date or paid record is published here. The separate reviewed post-judgment calculator explains its selectable motion and trigger conditions.
Which conditions need separate review?
- A renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law
- Establish the specified prior Rule 50(a) motion and legal questions. Determine whether the issue was decided by a verdict. Rule 50(b) permits an alternative or joint Rule 59 new-trial request, with its own applicable conditions.
- Established entry
- Rule 58(c) uses civil-docket entry when no separate document is required. If one is required, establish docket entry and the earlier of the separate document or 150 days from docket entry. This page does not derive that date.
- No routine enlargement
- Rule 6(b)(2) prohibits enlarging time under FRCP 50(b). An agreement or requested extension does not establish timely filing.
- Separate appeal consequences
- FRAP 4(a)(4) addresses listed motions filed within their allowed time and the order disposing of the last remaining motion. This page does not determine whether a filing qualifies or calculate appeal expiry.
- Separate service and local instructions
- Read the district’s filing requirements and applicable service provisions. A notice, draft, service attempt or merits argument does not establish completed timely filing.
- This page does not determine the motion’s merits or establish proper motion classification.
- It does not establish completed filing, an automatic extension, a stay or a notice-of-appeal deadline.
What should I verify before filing?
Common questions
A renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law
Does later judgment entry replace jury discharge for an undecided issue?
No. Rule 50(b) specifies jury discharge when the motion addresses a jury issue not decided by a verdict. Do not substitute a later judgment date for that event.
FRCP 50(b)Is this a first motion made after trial?
Rule 50(b) describes renewal of the specified Rule 50(a) motion that the court did not grant. Establish the actual prior motion, issues and applicable requirements separately.
FRCP 50(a)–(b)Is this an appellate-court filing?
No. The motion seeks relief in the district court under the Civil Rules. Its possible effect on appeal timing is a separate Rule 4(a)(4) question.
FRAP 4(a)(4)Can an ordinary good-cause extension enlarge this period?
No. Rule 6(b)(2) prohibits extending time to act under FRCP 50(b). Its prohibition is separate from Rule 6(a)’s computation and qualifying clerk-inaccessibility provisions.
FRCP 6(a)(1)–(6) and (b)(2)Does mailed notice of judgment add three days?
No. The operative event is judgment entry, or the specifically applicable Rule 50(b) jury discharge. Rule 6(d) concerns specified periods after service. It does not replace either event.
FRCP 6(d)Official sources and scope
Provisions used (6)
| Provision | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FRCP 50(b) | This motion, conditions and period |
| FRCP 58(c) | Established judgment entry |
| FRCP 6(a)(1) | Calendar-day computation |
| FRCP 6(a)(1)–(6) and (b)(2) | Final-day conditions, district filing and prohibition on enlargement |
| FRCP 6(d) | Service addition does not replace the actual event |
| FRAP 4(a)(4) | Separate listed-motion consequences for appeal timing |