Skip to main content

United States · Federal civil appeal timing

What limits an actual civil appeal extension?

FRAP 4(a)(5)(C) limits an extension to the later of thirty days after the original appeal expiry or fourteen days after entry of the granting order. Read the actual grant, which may allow less. Hamer holds this court-made cap nonjurisdictional. It does not make missed statutory appeal limits optional.

5.0Rated by lawyers in California, London and Singapore“The platform is really easy to use.” — Michael B., California“The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.” — Maria, London, UK“The most up-to-date service we could find.” — Li Chen, Singapore
Read why no date is calculated
Period
Rule 4(a)(5)(C) cap at the later of thirty days after original expiry or fourteen days after granting-order entry
Trigger
Established original appeal expiry and actual entry of the extension-granting order
Rule
FRAP 4(a)(5)(C)
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

December 1, 2025 compilation

Source guide · No automated date

Review the full procedure before selecting a date

The preset omits a required branch and the actual granted scope. No automated date or paid result is published.

FRAP 4(a)(5)(C)

What lawyers say

5.0
  • “The platform is really easy to use.”

    Michael B.Employment litigation attorney · California

  • “The Evidence Record saved us time with our insurance on bankruptcy matters.”

    MariaBankruptcy and commercial attorney · London, UK

  • “The most up-to-date service we could find.”

    Li ChenArbitration practitioner · Singapore

Which events control this procedure?

Establish the original appeal expiry and actual granting-order entry.

Read the granted deadline and scope. The rule cap does not promise the longest allowed extension.

Distinguish Hamer’s court-made cap from Section 2107’s statutory conditions and reopened notice period.

FRAP 4(a)(5)(C)

Which clocks must be distinguished?

  1. Read the actual grant.
  2. Establish original expiry plus thirty days.
  3. Establish granting-order entry plus fourteen days.
  4. Compare the rule cap with the actual granted deadline.

Two distinct events control the Rule 4(a)(5)(C) comparison. Establish and count each branch, then read the actual grant. An order-entry-only fourteen-day preset omits the thirty-day branch.

FRAP 26(a) excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate calendar days and carries a final Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday forward. Rule 26(a)(6) includes federal holidays, President or Congress declared holidays and, for forward periods, state-declared holidays where the challenged district court or circuit clerk’s principal office is located. Check actual state holidays, inaccessibility and any different prescribed time.

FRAP 26(a)(4)–(6), (b) and (c)

Why is no computed date published?

The preset omits a required branch and the actual granted scope. No automated date or paid result is published.

Which conditions require separate review?

Shorter grant
The maximum does not require the court to grant that maximum. The actual granted date controls the granted relief.
Hamer classification
Hamer distinguishes this court-made cap from statutory limits. It treats the cap as mandatory claim processing subject to waiver or forfeiture, not an automatic excuse for delay.
Separate reopening
The Rule 4(a)(6) and Section 2107(c) reopened fourteen-day period is a separate procedure. Hamer discusses Bowles’s untimely notice despite an erroneous longer reopening order.
FRAP 4(a)(5)(C)
  • This page does not grant relief, establish appellate entitlement or decide disputed case facts.
  • The preset omits a required branch and the actual granted scope. No automated date or paid result is published.

What must I verify before filing?

Common questions

What limits an actual civil appeal extension?

Is Rule 4(a)(5)(C)’s extension cap statutory?

Hamer holds that this cap appears in the court-made rule, not Section 2107. It remains a mandatory claim-processing rule.

Hamer, 583 U.S. 17, 22–28 (2017)

Is fourteen days after the grant always the final date?

No. Rule 4(a)(5)(C) compares that branch with thirty days after original expiry, and the actual grant may be shorter.

FRAP 4(a)(5)–(7)

Does Hamer guarantee relief from an untimely filing?

No. It decides classification, not every waiver, forfeiture or equitable-exception issue.

Hamer, 583 U.S. 17, 22–28 (2017)

Official sources and scope

Provisions used (12)
Provisions used in this guide
ProvisionPurpose
FRAP 4(a)(5)(C)The specific act, starting events and timing conditions
FRAP 4(a)(3) and (4)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRAP 4(a)(5)–(7)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRAP 4(c) and (d)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRAP 26(a)(1)–(3)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRAP 26(a)(4)–(6), (b) and (c)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRCP 5(d)(2)–(3)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRCP 58(a), separate-document requirementRelated entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRCP 58(a)–(e)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
FRCP 77(d)Related entry, notice, counting, relief or filing qualifications
28 U.S.C. § 2107(a)–(d), 2024 editionAdditional statutory comparison using the identified 2024 edition
Hamer, 583 U.S. 17, 22–28 (2017)Court-made extension cap distinguished from statutory appeal limits
Read the official Appellate Rules compilation

Cookie preferences

Deadline Engine uses necessary cookies for authentication and security. You can choose whether we may load Plausible Analytics to measure aggregate site use. We do not use advertising or marketing tracking. You can change this any time from the footer. Read the Cookie Policy.